Re: Thanks for fix, Website slightly confused
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:01:56PM +0100, Steve wrote: > > Care to share your rules for postfwd? I keep a somewhat updated reference of everything at: http://hege.li/howto/spam/etc/ Maybe you can get some ideas from the postfix setup too. Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
Re: Thanks for fix, Website slightly confused
Original-Nachricht > Datum: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:49:12 +0200 > Von: Henrik K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: policyd-weight-list@ek-muc.de > Betreff: Re: Thanks for fix, Website slightly confused > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:34:28PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > > > > No complaints here. If policyd-weight doesn't get a maintainer, guess > we'll > > be moving to postfwd. But I tried running that overnight instead, and > while > > it's a very promising framework it seemed not quite as mature yet. > > I've been running postfwd for several weeks on production already and it's > developing forward very quickly. You can do pretty much everything that > policyd-weight does and some better (like async DNS). It's missing some > checks like MX relations etc, but I don't know if thats really even > needed. > The developer is very active and knowable, so I think we are in good shape > there. > Care to share your rules for postfwd? > > Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/ -- Psst! Geheimtipp: Online Games kostenlos spielen bei den GMX Free Games! http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/free Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
Re: Thanks for fix, Website slightly confused
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:34:28PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > > No complaints here. If policyd-weight doesn't get a maintainer, guess we'll > be moving to postfwd. But I tried running that overnight instead, and while > it's a very promising framework it seemed not quite as mature yet. I've been running postfwd for several weeks on production already and it's developing forward very quickly. You can do pretty much everything that policyd-weight does and some better (like async DNS). It's missing some checks like MX relations etc, but I don't know if thats really even needed. The developer is very active and knowable, so I think we are in good shape there. Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
Re: Thanks for fix, Website slightly confused
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:34:05PM -0400, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment "policyd-weight Version: 0.1.14 beta-17" links to beta-15, Empty the cache, force a reload. It is 0.1.14 beta-17 for both (beta, devel) versions. > "You are > encouraged to update to a version newer than 0.1.14 beta-17" is nicely > proactive. Fixed. Sorry. -- Robert Felber (PGP: 896CF30B) Munich, Germany Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
