Original Message
Subject: Morgan - Dr. Albert E. Glowfinger: Dr. Wood Looks Forward to
PEER Reviews -- Remember JFK... (911 Blogger)
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 02:19:17 -0500
From: Thomas J. Mattingly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Morgan -
Maybe you were right in suggesting that
To make my biases explicit: I've got a completely open mind about the existence
of highly classified, unconventional weapons and military technologies in the
world, and about their possible use in 9/11 and other events. All the money
that we poured into SDI may have produced some interesting
[The Washington Post is a neocon rag, a propaganda arm of the Israel lobby,
and bears a major responsibility for helping goad the Bush administration
into the Iraq catastrophe. Nothing is more preposterous than the belief
that the Washington Post is liberal. Some of the chief Israeli ops at the
*YouTube of the day*
Alan Dershowitz on terrorist supporter Jimmy Carter: ...
Source: http://antonyloewenstein.com/blog/2006/12/14/youtube-of-the-day-55/
[In some fundamental way, the Israel lobby in the United States has lost its
mind, gone off the deep end, succumbed to a kind of trancelike
Some people are expendable and some people are protected. For the most part
mere presidents and cabinet heads are expendable, dunskies to be toyed with and
screwed with by Octopus ops like Matt Drudge.
When will things turn around? When enough people get burned (like Bush, Cheney
and
Who precisely do you think the lead oligarchs are? How do you rank them by
power? How do you identify their political orientation and objectives? How do
you map their social networks and specific vectors of influence?
This is all subject to rational, even scientific, analysis, right?
Maybe something here, maybe nothing...
nml
# /c = /category
# /i = /instance
# corrections and additions welcome
Douglas Feith /c 9/11 beneficiary
Douglas Feith /c 9/11 lead exploiter
Lewis Libby /c 9/11 beneficiary
Lewis Libby /c 9/11 lead exploiter
Northrop Grumman
Who precisely do you think the lead oligarchs are? How do you rank them by
power? How do you identify their political orientation and objectives? How do
you map their social networks and specific vectors of influence?
This is all subject to rational, even scientific, analysis, right?
What
So, who are the 100 most powerful oligarchs on the planet as of 2006?
Vigilius Haufniensis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who precisely do you think the lead oligarchs are? How do you
rank them by power? How do you identify their political orientation and
objectives? How do you
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,34400.shtml
Factiva Expands Taxonomy Warehouse Partner Network
Posted on : Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:03:00 GMT | Author : Factiva(R)
News Category : PressRelease
NEW YORK, Dec. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- Factiva(R), a Dow Jones and Reuters
im not sure it matters.
- Original Message -
From: Sean McBride
To: political-research@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [political-research] If You Don't Understand the Neocons...
So, who are the 100 most powerful oligarchs on the
The Myth Of Sending More Troops by Martin Sieff UPI Senior News Analyst
Washington (UPI) Dec 14, 2006
Space War Wed, 13 Dec 2006 5:26 PM PST
News reports this week indicate that President Bush is tilting towards
rejecting the advice of the Iraq Study Group and will maintain or even increase
ok, for the sake of argument, why not take the forbes list billionaires?
i agree, the oligarchical establishment seems to be not on the same page.
does this mean that the neocons are not expendable?
- Original Message -
From: Sean McBride
To:
13 matches
Mail list logo
