I first sounded the alarm bell about "Sorcha Faal" quite a few months ago, 
whose posts have always reeked of head games and hoaxes.   There is a simple 
rule of thumb in these matters: if you can't back up sensational claims with 
rock solid documentation and sources, you are almost certainly a fraud or 
deranged.  Why do people get pulled into this cheesy nonsense for even an 
instant?  Where is their critical intelligence?  "Sorcha Faal" is quite likely 
a disinformation working group within an intel agency with a fondness for 
pranks.


Vigilius Haufniensis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:            Imus never made the 
statement attributed to him in this article, it has been invented out of thin 
air and the entire story is a manufactured hoax that only serves to discredit 
the 9/11 Truth Movement, which is exactly why the Neo-Con blowhards have given 
it prominence.
   
  http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/160407pravdahoax.htm
   
             Drudge Promotes Imus Pravda Hoax
Attempts to link disgraced talk show host with 9/11 Truth Movement
    Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Monday, April 16, 2007

    
  
                      In what seems to be a deliberate ploy to link disgraced 
talk show host Don Imus with Rosie O'Donnell and the 9/11 Truth Movement, Matt 
Drudge is promulgating a now confirmed hoax which suggested that Imus was fired 
because he was about to expose secrets about the 9/11 attacks.
  As of early Monday afternoon, Drudge still carried a headline entitled, 
'Pravda: Imus fired after threat to reveal 9/11 secrets' - which links to the 
Pravda website reprint of an article written by "Sorcha Faal," who runs a 
website which also claims that Turkey has shot down a U.S. warplane, that 
Vladimir Putin is responsible for a 70% reduction in the population of bees 
across the U.S., and also solicits donations on behalf of the "Sisters of the 
Order" under the pretense of saving the earth from cosmic destruction.
  The story claims that the Imus controversy was a set-up in order to get him 
off the air before he could go public on 9/11 truth, and that Imus' racist 
comments, which he had routinely made, were blown up out of proportion in order 
to set the attack dogs loose.
  
  This website is obviously either a deliberate disinformation outlet or the 
work of someone with a very over-active imagination, but verification that the 
Imus story is a hoax was confirmed by readers of 9/11 Blogger, who combed 
through podcasts of Imus' interviews with Tim Russert, in which he supposedly 
made the claim that he would expose 9/11 secrets, but drew a complete blank.
  Imus never made the statement attributed to him in this article, it has been 
invented out of thin air and the entire story is a manufactured hoax that only 
serves to discredit the 9/11 Truth Movement, which is exactly why the Neo-Con 
blowhards have given it prominence.
  A deliberate attempt to link Imus' ignorant and racist comments with Rosie 
O'Donnell's controversial (yet completely accurate) statements and chill free 
speech as a whole is underway, with lying Neo-Con slugs like Tom Delay leading 
the way.
  On Friday, Delay appeared on CNN and called for an organized campaign aimed 
at having Rosie O'Donnell fired for her comments about 9/11, despite the fact 
that O'Donnell simply asked questions about how Building 7, a 47 story building 
in the WTC complex that was not hit by a plane and yet symmetrically imploded 
in the late afternoon of September 11.
  As we reported today, Neo-Cons are rejoicing at the fact that Rosie has 
supposedly agreed to shut up and talk about "other things" on The View, but in 
actual fact she plans to have 9/11 first responders on the show this week to 
expose the toxic dust cover-up scandal. 











  

         

Reply via email to