Eighty-one veterans, all with health problems, have been told they
must find another place to live by Nov. 30 because budget cuts are
forcing the state to close the Milledgeville domiciliary unit at the
Georgia War Veterans Home.
Senate Democratic Leader Robert Brown of Macon accused Republicans
Merry Christmas, everyone.
On Dec 22, 9:27 am, wncs wncswonderl...@gmail.com wrote:
In these last few days before Christmas (3 more sleeps!), let's set
this thread aside to share our favorite holiday music/videos/recipes/
memories, whatever. Who knows, maybe we will find something we can
Me, too.
And I hope it isn't too long before we have a lot less to bitch and
moan about.
On Dec 26, 3:28 pm, NavyBrat dotis2...@comcast.net wrote:
I'm glad well have someone else to bitch and moan about for 4 years.
On Dec 26, 12:49 pm, mike [never forget] 532
littlemike...@gmail.com
It's his board, he can lie if he wants to. But, I'm still going to
point it out when I see it.
On Sep 7, 4:36 am, mike532 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I think you just plain lied again.
well there is nothing new about that is there ?
On Sep 6, 9:12 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks for your Kerry vote in 2004, too.
On Sep 7, 7:24 am, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
me too lew. I am a vet and I am voting for a fellow vet.
On Sep 7, 7:17 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike:
I'm a veteran.
I'm not confronting McCain.
On Sep 7, 3:14 am,
Thank you. I apologize, too.
On Sep 7, 6:52 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In looking at the footage, I believe I was wrong...
During the speech it was just a quick shot, and I saw something that
wasn't there.
I apologize Sarge, I was wrong.
On Sep 6, 6:12 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED
youlike Sarge, I believe it shows just how much
respect I should show you, when you clearly have none to show
yourself.
On Sep 7, 10:13 am, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's his board, he can lie if he wants to. But, I'm still going to
point it out when I see it.
On Sep 7, 4:36 am
I hope this isn't true. The Dems claim they weren't going to throw
those flags away. There is a prescribed method of disposing of flags
and throwing them away isn't one of them. Title 4, Chapter 1 describes
the disposal of the flag
the money they get per Year, but most
people cannot.
On Sep 8, 4:57 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the socialist Alakan state lives off oil revenues, what would you
expect?
On Sep 8, 6:19 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 8, 1:59 pm, VT Sean Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED
And Republicans think you borrow the money from a hat as witnessed by
the record deficits of the REegan and Bush administrations.
When Bush, Sr. wanted Americans to pay their way, Republicans rejected
him.
On Sep 8, 6:29 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
libs think you just pull money from a
:
Funny...
I don't see you bitching about the Resources bought with the
Louisiana Purchase.
Why is that you suppose?
What about New York?
Wasn't it bought for some Beads, or something like that?
On Sep 8, 6:04 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does state's rights include
Socialism is great?
On Sep 8, 9:42 pm, Sage2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Gaar,
Every man,woman and child in Alaska recieved $3,259
dollars which was $2,059 dollars more than any administration prior to
Governor Palin !
I'm going to give some links. Just so you understand what the links
are, they refer to PNAC (Project For A New American Century) website.
Some say that George Bush was controlled by this group and led into
the misadventure of Iraq. In 1993, Dick Cheney, a member of PNAC said
that toppling the
and a former member of the Taliban.
On Sep 9, 3:05 am, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a really filthy right wing think tank, hardcore neo-con policy
makers.
On Sep 9, 4:59 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to give some links. Just so you understand what the links
Alaska is, literally, a welfare state. The entire state runs offf
government welfare. We bought Alaska with federal money and the oil
proceeds go to Alaska. Running Alaska depends upon how well you beg
for earmarks. That is what Palin did and she was good at it. Now she
claims she was against the
The Bush administration is so inept!!! Iran attacked us on 9/11 and
they attacked Afghanistan and Iraq!
On Sep 19, 8:59 pm, Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: *Travis*
Date: Thu, Sep 18, 2008
Subject: Iran's role in 9/11 exposed
Definitely. Defectors have also confirmed this.
B
Biden to Gingrich: You're an asshole who, like all Republicans, have
no plan but, stand on the sideline and try to demean those who do. The
Republican plan is to swiftboat any Democrat candidate rather than
offering your own plan. You only try to confuse voters by making
ridiculous claims like
It was a September surprise or not so much a surprise that our economy
is failing this time. What is the limit of neo-con blindness?
On Sep 20, 12:29 am, voxitar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:03 PM, PoliticalAmazon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would you please provide
Against Texas? If it's Crawford, I wish them the best of luck.
On Sep 19, 10:15 pm, Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: *Travis*
Date: Wed, Sep 17, 2008
Subject: Al Qaeda Warns of Sleeper Cell WMD Attack Against Texas
Al Qaeda Warns of Sleeper Cell WMD Attack Against
Yes, it does matter who is the blame. You should recognize who is the
blame and vote them out of office.
On Sep 20, 9:58 am, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is sending a financial-rescue
plan worth about $800 billion to Congress as Democrats prepare to turn
This fool lib happens to support going into Pakistan after the Taliban
and al Qaeda when we know they are there. In fact, this fool lib
supports the statement of Bush that he would chase them anywhere on
the globe. What this fool lib does not support is all-out war against
a country which had no
It's amazing how many of the fascist idiots don't know that Germany
declared war on us before we declared war on them.
On Sep 21, 9:47 am, Hollywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
flamestar,
Don't be ridiculous, the U.S. Congress declared war on Germany in
response to Germany's declaration of war
Thanks, I have pics of the graduation ceremonies too if google would
let me post the link.
On Sep 21, 4:32 pm, Hollywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SgtUSMC,
Nothing those shitbirds say surprises me any longer.
Hey, great pics from Parris island.
On Sep 21, 1:41 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED
This was a bill proposed by Bush. Since everything Bush has attempted
ended in failure, it should tell you something.
This bill would have created a new government agency to oversee Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac. This shouldn't be surprising, either, since Bush
has presided over the largest
As pointed out, the Army cannot be, legally, used to police American
citizens (Martial Law.) But, then, when the hell did a neocon ever
worry about the law?
On Sep 22, 7:54 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope they use them to round up all the anti American, hate filled,
left wing liberal
Gosh, another George Bush. Has she reported hearing voices commanding
her to invade another nation?
On Sep 22, 8:01 pm, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sarah Palin has the potential to shape human destiny to a degree
previously undreamed of, pitch fork in one hand, bible in the other.
If the
Bush is trying to pull annother Patriot Act, fear-mongering on the
economy. While Pelosi fellates bush economically, the Senate Dems have
already countered with a bill which would not include further
usurpation of powers by the executive branch. The more conservative
Republican, Newt Gingrich,
The witch doctor's name? Barry's abandoned brother, GEORGE OBAMA!
===
Is that true? Nah! You're lying.
On Sep 22, 8:50 pm, voxitar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:36 PM, PoliticalAmazon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
She's qualified to be God because she once had paryer
LOL!
On Sep 22, 9:11 pm, voxitar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:07 PM, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The witch doctor's name? Barry's abandoned brother, GEORGE OBAMA!
===
Is that true? Nah! You're lying.
How dare you accuse me of being a liberal
We've put the poor on welfare and now are putting the elite on
welfare. All we have to do is destroy the middle class and put them on
welfare.
On Sep 22, 9:25 pm, d.b.baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 22, 9:04 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...While Pelosi fellates bush
You always call people ignorant and right after you have shown your
ignorance. I'll use an article from the ultra-conservative Heritage
Foundation to give you what they say are the facts about the Chrysler
bailout. This is from 1983.
1- The truth is that the Chrysler Corporation has gone
It could be there will no country to come back to after 4 more years
of Republican wrecking of the economy.
On Sep 22, 10:48 pm, studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 22, 10:15 am, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://news-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080921/NEWS0107/80...
THE
No, it doesn't. The point I should make is Chrysler could have gotten
pretty much the same deal and result by filing bankruptcy. The
creditors footed the bill. The government bailed out Chrysler at the
expense of many others. They fudged the facts on their recovery to
increase stock value. I
Industry
in this Nation with Refineries and everything, that come WITH High
PAYING Jobs, but NOOO!
Damn Liberals have to stop every effort to expand our Oil Industry and
force it Offshore.
And now you want to blame others...
Imagine that.
On Sep 22, 10:25 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL
They didn't even bother to take the 2007 copyright off the picture
when they photoshopped it.
On Sep 23, 1:47 am, Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Travis
Subject: November 5, 2008
Date: Monday, September 22, 2008,
**
--
*~@):~{
Untitled.jpg
53KViewDownload
Untitled.jpg
Apparently they have been drilling illegally.
http://finance.comcast.net/www/news.html?x=http://www.origin.comcast.akadns.net/data/news/2008/09/11/1056052.xml
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of PoliticalForum at Google Groups.
For options help see
We don't need a bailout. If we're going to give away another handout,
give the money to the people who can't afford to pay their mortgages.
This will kill two birds with one stone. People will have a place to
live and the loans will be taken care of so the poorly run financial
institutions won't
Hopefully Congress won't pass the Bush/Paulson bailout. If they want a
bailout they should let the CEO's bail themselves out. They are the
only ones with the money to do it. The taxpayer can't afford it.
And lets get some regulations in place so this doesn't continue.
On Sep 23, 6:32 pm,
anything about the foreclosures or improve the economy and we
will be bailing them out again.
On Sep 23, 9:38 pm, studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:anything to help
the
On Sep 23, 6:40 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't need a bailout. If we're going to give away another handout,
give
Paulson wrote the Bush plan. Congress won't pass it. The Democrats are
holding out for oversight and the Republicans don't want a socialist
bill. I think Bush will have a hard time pulling the wool over our
eyes this time.
On Sep 23, 6:58 pm, Hollywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SgtUSMC,
You
I'm not saying there will be no bailout. I'm sure there will be. I
just don't think they are going to give the fox a crate of hens with
no one to watch him.
On Sep 24, 12:21 am, Hollywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SgtUSMC,
Let us all pray you are correct.
On Sep 23, 9:12 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL
Not funny
On Sep 26, 9:08 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FBI had an opening for an assassin. After all the background
checks, interviews and testing were done, there were 3 finalists; two
men and a woman.
For the final test, the FBI agents took one of the men to a large
metal door
You've probably forgotten that we had a Republican congress and a
Republican president in 2005. How the hell did McCain think this would
get by them? Or did he claim to support it knowing the Republicans
would never pass it?
On Sep 26, 7:15 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the financial
The original plan was written by Henry Paulson.
On Sep 26, 4:53 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 10:41 am, Hollywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's alI I was saying. That the bill was introduced in it's
original form, by George Bush and his Sec. of Treasury Henry Paulson.
Only one president was ever divorced.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of PoliticalForum at Google Groups.
For options help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active
You probably don't know who it was.
If you do you will stick your head up your ass and claim it isn't an
issue with the evangelicals. It's your issue.
On Sep 26, 10:37 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and?
On Sep 26, 10:25 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only one president
..
Peace,
Doc
On Sep 26, 9:16 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He opposes the bailout?- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of PoliticalForum at Google Groups.
For options help see http://groups.google.com
Reagan didn't remember selling arms to the Ayatollah.
On Sep 26, 10:44 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
REAGAN didn't rmember what reagan asked...
On Sep 26, 10:51 am, studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In front of an estimated 100 million viewers in 1980,
Ronald
Are you a PNAC, neo-con, Bush ass licker, too? Or a conservative?
On Sep 26, 11:05 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reagan, and so?
On Sep 26, 10:57 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You probably don't know who it was.
If you do you will stick your head up your ass and claim
Isn't family values one of your issues? Or are you a neocon?
On Sep 26, 11:05 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reagan, and so?
On Sep 26, 10:57 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You probably don't know who it was.
If you do you will stick your head up your ass and claim it isn't
You were watching a different debate from the one I saw.
On Sep 27, 1:11 am, MANOJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sen. Obama appeared kind of nervous from his face, while Sen. McCain
looked confident.
On Sep 26, 11:11 pm, El Tortuga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Psychobabble
On Sep 26, 11:38
I got amessage saying the video had been removed from youtube because
of a copyright claim by NBC.
You can watch it at NBC:
http://www.nbc.com/Saturday_Night_Live/video/clips/couric-palin-open/704042/
On Sep 28, 8:17 am, Cold Water [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sarah Palin's Interview with Katie
Please read before responding.
On Sep 27, 2:49 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 26, 7:25 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only one president was ever divorced.
So now, in your mind Sarge, you can't be President if you have been
Divorced
And McCain no longer needs to be in Washington. I'm sure it's just a
coincidence.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of PoliticalForum at Google Groups.
For options help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at
And this board doesn't address it. I thought I would, finally, be on
the side of the conservatives in opposing the Bush bailout.
Where is the discussion?
Is this board really that far removed from the issues?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of
As McCain said, Horse shit.
On Sep 29, 9:28 am, d.b.baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Q] - Well there is more. I'm told that the DOJ will be looking into
(most likely referring to the FBI) this as a possible civil rights
violation as well as violation of free speech. Specifically St. Louis
The vote is not failing in the house. The Dems won't support the Bush
bailout if the Republicans don't. The result is that America wins.
There is no provisioon to constrain illogical lending practices in the
bill. Without regulations we will continue on the same course.
The Dems are, indeed,
Amen!
But, most on here don't even know it is a Republican plan they are
complaining about.
On Sep 29, 6:49 pm, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paulson Plan Is Still a Pig, Even With Lipstick: Caroline Baum
Commentary by Caroline Baum
Sept. 29 (Bloomberg) -- If Treasury Secretary Hank
I'm just glad to see Mark's and Travis' ridiculous spamming of the
board when there is a legitimate subject to be discussed.
I came here in hopes that people would be having a discussion of the
most important issue of the day. My bad.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks
And rape isn't possible because a woman can run faster with her skirt
up than a man can with his pants down. :(
On Sep 29, 7:52 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everyone knows there is no way a man can ever win an argument with a
woman.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
:
all they are doing is treatng the syptomology.. nothing is in the
bill to adress the CAUSE.
On 9/29/08, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vote is not failing in the house. The Dems won't support the Bush
bailout if the Republicans don't. The result is that America wins
When I saw the title I thought you had misspellled Palin.
On Sep 26, 6:20 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YWE1YTg0N2I5OTQ1ZWNkYjFmYTNjZjQ2...
The economy is passing a kidney stone. Here’s one man’s guide to
survival.
By Bill Whittle
Last Friday I
Does he?
He was, belatedly, swung to the neocon view today. Even so, he says he
would reluctantly and sadly support the neocon bill.
On Sep 29, 8:08 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, not now...
He believes something needs to be done.
On Sep 29, 4:44 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Who gives a shit about the elite markets. What about the average
American?
On Sep 29, 3:49 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WIth the Jewish Holiday, we are not likely to see any Legislation
until the end of the week.
This is going to show us just how strong our Markets/Economy truly
is...
Gingrich opposes the bailout, no?
On Sep 28, 8:49 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Newt Gingrich, for one...
On Sep 28, 4:43 am, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone name a single politician that can be described as an expert
on socio-economics and an intellectual, committed to
] wrote:
Nearly 2/3 of All American own Stocks...
I guess you believe the guy next door is an Elitist.
On Sep 29, 4:52 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who gives a shit about the elite markets. What about the average
American?
On Sep 29, 3:49 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Do turtles have sex?
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewPicturefriendID=47863534albumId=2381523
On Sep 29, 8:33 pm, El Tortuga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt that Biden qualifies
On Sep 29, 7:52 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everyone knows there is no
And you can't survive it for the good of the nation?
On Sep 29, 8:44 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we do nothing the average American will suffer, regardless if they
had anything to do with it or not...
On Sep 29, 5:36 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't give
anything to do with it or not...
On Sep 29, 5:36 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really don't give a damn about you or the guy next door. I believe
in the constitution. You take your Bush bailout if you want it. When
the economy fails, I'll be here, eating squirrel, 'possum
that
Lending money to People who couldn't pay it back was a good idea, and
they changed the Rules.
On Sep 29, 5:52 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we just let the crooks do whatever they want to.
On Sep 29, 8:46 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was the Regulators who
I don't. I'm very serious.
On Sep 29, 9:01 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do libs have a sense of humor? hell no
On Sep 29, 8:46 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do turtles have sex?
http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewPicture...
On Sep 29, 8:33 pm
. Someone needs to go to jail and the best
place to start is Cristopher Dodd and Barney Frank.
On Sep 29, 7:44 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we do nothing the average American will suffer, regardless if they
had anything to do with it or not...
On Sep 29, 5:36 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL
Throwing money at the people who caused this problem certainly won't
help us get out of the problem.
On Sep 29, 10:03 pm, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Fed has already pumped hundreds of billions of dollars into Wall
St bailouts taking on to it's books Freddie and Fanny that hold 80% of
That's good news. Damn, I hate agreeing with you illiterate scumbags.
In Alabama, we learned to read in high school.
On Sep 29, 6:20 pm, d.b.baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What emergency?
Well, you can be sure the upscale restaurants are booked up tonight.
I only wish we weren't paying the
John McCain, you are no Eisenhower.
On Sep 29, 9:38 pm, rigsy03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.startribune.com/opinion/commentary/29814074.html?
elr=KArks:DCiV1PciV_ckiqK8DMEkDuu (ugh!) Maybe Sarah can bring a
baby polar bear to the veep debate a la Checkers?
You aren't going to support your Bush god on this?
You got your tax cuts for the rich and bailed out Wall Street.
Everyone got something out of this except the working American. I'm
surprised you aren't delighted.
On Oct 1, 10:53 pm, d.b.baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forget the sweetheart
It would certainly help more than putting the bill on the taxpayer
again. Trickle down has never worked.
On Oct 1, 9:07 pm, mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of bailing out AIG to the tune of $85,000,000,00, I'm in
favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in a We Deserve It
Dividend.
The problem isn't Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They've been around for
many decades. The problem was decreasing regulation on the lending
insitutions. It was the same thing that caused the SL failures.
That's why the bailout is wrong. First, we need to correct the
problem, regulate lending so this
Oh, and it does not require a 2/3 vote in the Senate to pass a bill.
On Oct 1, 12:36 pm, Keith In Tampa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Hollywood,
It takes a quorom in the House and a 2/3's majority in the Senate to get a
Bill passed. So, no, it was not that the Republicans who were
All the right-wing liars try to blame Fannie Mae Freddie Mac. They
didn't make the rules that allowed this.
Jimmy Carter hasn't been in office for almost three decades. Nope, you
can't place the blame there. Bill Clinton has been out of office for
almost a decade. Nope, can't place the blame
I had believed, back then, that we may be facing a Financial meltdown
if we didn't do something, and quick.
Oh, no, you were backing it because Bush told you to. You have said
many times there was no economic problem. Obviously, there is an
economic problem. But, bailing out Wall Street
Here are the facts. Let's Review:
In 2004/early 2005, a Bill captioned, the Federal Housing Enterprise
Regulatory Reform Act of 2004/2005, sponsored by Republicans, .John
McCain,
Elizabeth Dole, John Sununu, and Chuck Hagel, was put before the
Congress.
The Bill was blocked, by the Democrats
I've read much of DiLorenzo. LewRockwell is a great site. However,
even DiLorenzo gets federalism wrong. Federalism is the usurpation of
powers by the federal government. I know, the cons have tried to turn
this on its head. James Madison and Hamilton, who were among the
original federalists
I knew Bush had espoused a dictatorship. I was't aware McCain had done
the same.
On Oct 2, 12:44 am, RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John McCain, with a completely straight face, made the comment
recently I always aspire to be a dictator. George W. Bush had made
similar comments on three separate
It was the Republicans who got us into this mess. It was the
Republicans who caused the failure of the SL's in th 80's. It was the
Republicans that sponsored the Great Depression. It was the
Republicans who gave us the recessions of the last half of the 19th
century.
It's always the Dems who
It was Bush who said he would make Iraq the central front.
Read what Gen. McKiernan is saying about Afghanistan now.
On Sep 29, 10:43 am, jgg1000a [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course you must to retain the myth that Iraq is somehow different
than Afghanistan... But those pesky facts as
1)
I told you, I've read DiLorenzo. Many of his works are on lewrockwell.
I totally aqree with him.
Your efforts to educate people is exemplary. But, most neocon Bush
supporters are ill-educated and rely on pundits to educate them. Why
do you think they are still neocons?
On Oct 2, 1:47 am, M.A.
Oh... my ignorance .. is that the only thing you can ever come up
with?
On Oct 2, 2:43 am, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was doing nothing because Bush toild me to...
Your iognorance on such matters notwithstanding.
On Oct 1, 9:26 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had believed
1, 9:31 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the facts. Let's Review:
In 2004/early 2005, a Bill captioned, the Federal Housing Enterprise
Regulatory Reform Act of 2004/2005, sponsored by Republicans, .John
McCain,
Elizabeth Dole, John Sununu, and Chuck Hagel, was put before
their freedom of speech against his Iraq plan. I know you
won't go against your lord god Bush.
On Oct 2, 2:48 am, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 10:14 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, the Republicans
oppose the other nine and any unlisted inalienable right.
So you say
tried telling them there were no
problems...
Again, your ignorance on these matters is quite evident.
On Oct 1, 11:50 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really, it was the people who caused the problem? Have you ever
qualified for a loan? Now, it's the people who forced the lending
pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm for all ten of the bill of rights. Unlike you, I am not
partisan.
It's up to you to tell me which one of the other nine amendments you
support. We can start with freedom of speech. The Bush administration
said you are eith fer us or agin us
Amen!
On Oct 2, 3:30 am, Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Majority Leader Reid, a Nevada Democrat, exercised his authority to
attach the bailout plan to an unrelated piece of legislation already
on the Senate calendar, a bill that mandated equal treatment by
healthcare insurers for mental and
I just hate Bush for his liberalism.
On Oct 2, 3:25 am, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you assume I'm in agreement with the current drug laws or
prostitution laws?
Since you asked, no, I'm not for the drug laws. I'm a social liberal
and a fiscal conservative. I've tried to tell you
McCain said there must be no earmarks in the wall street bailout. He
said he wouldn't vote for the bill with earmarks.
Is that why McCain voted for these earmarks?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Thanks for being part of PoliticalForum at Google Groups.
For options help
And that's why it's called a garrote:
http://reference.howstuffworks.com/garrote-encyclopedia.htm
On Oct 2, 7:16 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 4:11 pm, Hollywood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well fuck, now I've obviously no choice other than to hang myself from
the water pipe in
Speaking in Washington yesterday, McKiernan described Afghanistan as
“a far more complex environment than I ever found in Iraq.” The
country’s mountainous terrain, rural population, poverty, illiteracy,
400 major tribal networks and history of civil war all make for unique
challenges, he said.
It was the O'biden remark that got you?
On Oct 2, 10:44 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one was fooled by your little rant about Voting for McCain in the
first place...
On Oct 2, 7:39 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wind up doll at best i was going to vote for
been a general since the Civil
War, and not a very good one even then. :-)
On Oct 2, 10:04 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking in Washington yesterday, McKiernan described Afghanistan as
“a far more complex environment than I ever found in Iraq.” The
country’s mountainous terrain
with other comments he
made, so those words could be put in context.
On Oct 2, 7:44 pm, SgtUSMC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What you posted was someone's opinion of what he wants to do with the
additional troops. What I posted was his words.
On Oct 2, 10:09 pm, Gaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
