From: Travis
Subject: Dem Rahall Proposes Bill to End All Mining in the U.S.
Date: Monday, March 9, 2009,


http://www.icmj.com/article.php?id=56&keywords=Rahall_Proposes_Bill_to_End_All_Mining_in_the_U.S

Rahall Proposes Bill to End All Mining in the
U.S.<http://www.icmj.com/article.php?opt=1&id=56&keywords=Rahall_Proposes_Bill_to_End_All_Mining_in_the_U.S.>
by Scott Harn<http://www.icmj.com/writers-detail.php?id=4&keywords=Scott_Harn>

Nick Rahall, chairman of the House Resources Committee, reintroduced mining
reform legislation in the House of Representatives on January 27, 2009. The
Congressman has obviously been away from real work for far too long. H.R.
699, the Hardrock Mining and Reclamation Act of 2009, should be labeled H.R.
666 because it appears to have been written by the Devil himself. *If it
passes as written, it will completely destroy an entire industry*.

Here are a few “highlights” from H.R. 699:

   - Casual use would be redefined to allow only those activities that do
   not cause “any disturbance of public lands and resources.” The collection of
   samples, use of gold pans and non-motorized sluices would be the only
   activities allowed without a Notice or Plan. Taking a vehicle off-road would
   also require a Notice or Plan. Any extraction of minerals for sale or use
   would require a Notice or Plan.
   - H.R. 699 would be retroactive. Existing mining that is not already
   operating under a Notice of Plan would require proof of a valuable discovery
   to retain a mining claim, and those operating under a Notice or Plan would
   have ten years to bring their operation under compliance with the new
   regulations.
   - The patenting of mining claims, which has been suspended by yearly
   legislation since 1994, would be permanently discontinued.
   - The federal government would be entitled to an 8 percent gross royalty
   for all locatable minerals for any new mining operation. Even if the miner
   is unable to make a reasonable profit at current commodity prices, he would
   have to give 8 percent to the federal government. Existing operations at the
   time the bill is passed would be subject to a 4 percent gross royalty, and
   any federal lands added to the operation after enactment of the bill would
   be subject to the 8 percent royalty.
   - The reporting requirements are absurd. Anyone transporting a locatable
   mineral, concentrate or product derived from a locatable mineral shall carry
   documentation declaring the amount, origin and intended destination. Miners
   shall create and maintain reports relating to the quantity, quality,
   composition, volume, weight and assay value of all minerals extracted from a
   mining claim. Failure to produce these reports when requested by any officer
   or employee designated by the federal government may result in involuntary
   forfeiture of the mining claim.
   - The federal government would be authorized to conduct audits of all
   claim holders, operators, transporters, purchasers, processors, or other
   persons directly or indirectly involved in the production or sales of
   locatable minerals.
   - Mining claim maintenance fees would be raised to $150 per claim, and
   would be adjusted at least every five years based on the Consumer Price
   Index. The location fee would be increased to $50 per claim.
   - Tens of millions of acres would be added to existing areas that are
   already off-limits to mining, including Wilderness Study Areas; areas of
   critical environmental concern; areas designated for inclusion in the
   National Wild and Scenic Rivers System; areas designated for potential
   addition, or eligible for inclusion; and any area identified in the set of
   inventoried roadless maps contained in the Forest Service Roadless Area
   Conservation Final Environmental Impact Statement, Volume 2, dated November
   2000.
   - Any State, political subdivision of a State, or Indian tribe could
   petition the Secretary of Interior to withdraw areas based on drinking water
   supplies, wildlife habitat, cultural or historic resources, scenic vistas or
   other similar values. Indian tribes could also petition for the withdrawal
   of areas for religious or cultural value.
   - The bill would give the Secretary the authority to deny any operation
   that may cause undue degradation.
   - To get an approved Plan, the operator would have to be able to show
   that no treatment of discharged water will be necessary 10 years after mine
   closure, and any Plan could be changed or halted if additional information
   about scientific, cultural or biological resources becomes available.
   - The miner would have to submit an application to the federal government
   to request any cessation of operations greater than 180 days. A miner would
   have to obtain consent of the federal government to transfer ownership of
   any operation, and the transfer would require a fee to be paid to cover the
   government’s administrative costs.
   - Financial assurance (bonding) would be required for any
   operation—presumably this would also apply to suction gold dredging—and the
   amount would be evaluated and adjusted every 3 years. Where water treatment
   is necessary, financial assurance funds would not be released until there is
   5 full years where treatment is not necessary.
   - States would be allowed to implement regulations that exceed the
   regulations in this bill.
   - The federal government would be allowed to collect administrative fees
   to cover expenses incurred while regulating mining operations.
   - Mining operations would be subjected to a minimum of one complete
   inspection per year.
   - The bill would provide environmental lawyers an unending source of
   income. Any citizen would be allowed to file a civil lawsuit against the
   miner or the federal government to force compliance with the mining laws
   after giving sixty days written notice. The court would be allowed to award
   the costs of litigation, including attorney and witness fees, as the court
   deems appropriate.
   - Any miner who fails to comply with any portion of a permit would be
   subjected to a fine of $25,000 per day.
   - Any citizen who believes they are being adversely affected by a mining
   operation could request an inspection. If the Secretary agrees that an
   inspection is warranted, the complainant would be allowed to join in the
   inspection. Complainants could remain anonymous if desired.
   - Any person who engages in mineral activities without the required
   permit, if convicted, would be punished by a fine of not less than $5,000
   per day or by imprisonment for up to 3 years or both.
   - Designated employees of the Department of Interior and Department of
   Agriculture would be given full law enforcement powers over permitted
   miners, including the power to subpoena miners to force attendance,
   testimony, and disclosure of all paperwork, and warrantless searches of
   vehicles and buildings expected to contain locatable minerals or products
   derived from them would be allowed.
   - The Secretary would be forced to prevent mineral activities that could
   have an adverse impact on the resources and values of National Conservation
   System Units.


H.R. 699 would completely wipe out all small-scale mining in the United
States. Small-scale miners do not have the time and resources to handle the
fees, lawsuits and reporting requirements.

Large-scale mining would be also phased out as mining companies would be
unable to deal with the unattainable requirements of these regulations,
citizen lawsuits, thin profit margins, reporting requirements, and the
uncertainty that comes with the federal government’s new authority to halt a
mining operation when “undue degradation” is occurring or a scientific,
biological or cultural resource is discovered. Many areas that may have
potential would be inaccessible. No one in their right mind would provide
funding for exploration or operations under the proposed conditions.

The most likely outcome would be that the environment would suffer as mining
companies move all operations to countries with little or no regulations.

Like the current situation with oil, Americans would be forced to obtain
natural resources overseas, sending money to countries that don’t like
Americans and would love to control our prices.

The legislation is co-sponsored by Reps. George Miller (D-CA), Henry Waxman
(D-CA), Ed Markey (D-MA), Howard Berman (D-CA), Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ), Rush
Holt (D-NJ), Jim Costa (D-CA), Donna Christensen (D-VI), Pete Stark (D-CA),
Dale Kildee (D-MI), Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), Patrick
Kennedy (D-RI), Ron Kind (D-WI), Lois Capps (D-CA), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Mike
Honda (D-CA), John Salazar (D-CO), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), Niki Tsongas (D-MA),
and Gerry Connolly (D-VA).

The legislators who have sponsored this bill should be labeled as
un-American, voted out of office, and sent packing for attempting to
decimate one of the few industries that has managed to stay afloat and
provide an honest paycheck during these tough economic times.

Please take a minute to contact your Representative and Senator to let them
know your stance on H.R. 699. Better yet, why not start a recall effort if
one of the bill’s sponsors is in your area, or stop by their local office
for a bigger impact?

Contact information for each of the bill sponsors:


   - Nick Rahall (D-WV)                  phone  202 ...
   - George Miller (D-CA)               phone  202 ...
   - Henry Waxman (D-CA)            phone  202 ...
   - Ed Markey (D-MA)                     phone  202 ...
   - Howard Berman (D-CA)          phone  202 ...
   - Raúl Grijalva (D-AZ)                 phone  202 ...
   - Rush Holt (D-NJ)                     phone  202 ...
   - Jim Costa (D-CA)                     phone  202 ...
   - Donna Christensen (D-VI)      phone  202 ...
   - Dale Kildee (D-MI)                    phone  202 ...
   - Maurice Hinchey (D-NY)          phone  202 ...
   - Earl Blumenauer (D-OR)        phone  202 ...
   - Patrick Kennedy (D-RI)           phone  202 ...
   - Ron Kind (D-WI)                       phone  202 ...
   - Lois Capps (D-CA)                  phone  202 ...
   - Adam Schiff (D-CA)                  phone  202 ...
   - Mike Honda (D-CA)                  phone  202 ...
   - John Salazar (D-CO)               phone  202 ...
   - Anna Eshoo (D-CA)                 phone  202 ...
   - Niki Tsongas (D-MA)               phone  202 ...
   - Gerry Connolly (D-VA)              phone  202 ...










-- 
*~@):~{>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to