Re: [pollen] Licensing for Pollen projects

> On Dec 7, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Joel Dueck wrote: > > For any serious work, though, I am wondering how this approach would really > shake out. When “the book is a program”, is it ever a) useful or b) legally > meaningful to license the prose and the code separately when

[pollen] Licensing for Pollen projects

In the Pollen projects I've released so far, I've tried to make the licensing for the code pretty permissive (= more useful for other Pollen-curious folks), but to assert slightly more control over the writing itself. (For example