Re: [pollen] Question about Pollen markup

2019-03-13 Thread Brendan Stromberger
That is incredibly helpful. Thanks so much for the tip. I was trying to do this very thing earlier. Many thanks, for the help and the patience. Cheers, B On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 3:56:53 PM UTC-5, Matthew Butterick wrote: > > Here's how I debug Pollen functions. I have the `debug`

Re: [pollen] Question about Pollen markup

2019-03-13 Thread Matthew Butterick
Here's how I debug Pollen functions. I have the `debug` package installed, and then I change my #lang line to #lang debug racket/base (or `#lang debug racket` etc) And then when I put #R in front of any expression, it prints to the Pollen console when a page is rendered. In this case, you

Re: [pollen] Question about Pollen markup

2019-03-13 Thread Brendan Stromberger
Ah, my ◊comment's won't evaluate inside a ◊ol[…], so I guess there's that. On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 3:18:03 PM UTC-5, Brendan Stromberger wrote: > > Is there a reason the curly-brace syntax is preferable? I've tried for the > past 2 hours but using filter-split on "\n" seems to have no

Re: [pollen] Question about Pollen markup

2019-03-13 Thread Brendan Stromberger
Is there a reason the curly-brace syntax is preferable? I've tried for the past 2 hours but using filter-split on "\n" seems to have no effect on my output. It seems more explicit to me to just use the ◊(ul[…]) form and not have to do any mangling of xexprs. I think this is what you were