On 10/08/12 14:52, Phil Clayton wrote:
On 10/08/12 09:51, David Matthews wrote:
I think it would probably be a good idea to add a range of conversions
with and without explicit lengths, e.g. UINT64, LONGLONG and also
possibly INT_PTR and UINT_PTR.
Yes, that does sound good.
I have found the f
On 10/08/12 09:51, David Matthews wrote:
On 08/08/2012 22:51, Phil Clayton wrote:
My bindings for GLib/GTK+ etc. involve some functions with 64 bit
parameter/return values, using the C types gint64/guint64 - GLib's
portable 64 bit integers. On Linux i386, these types are defined using
'signed/u
On 08/08/2012 22:51, Phil Clayton wrote:
My bindings for GLib/GTK+ etc. involve some functions with 64 bit
parameter/return values, using the C types gint64/guint64 - GLib's
portable 64 bit integers. On Linux i386, these types are defined using
'signed/unsigned long long int'. I believe the C l
My bindings for GLib/GTK+ etc. involve some functions with 64 bit
parameter/return values, using the C types gint64/guint64 - GLib's
portable 64 bit integers. On Linux i386, these types are defined using
'signed/unsigned long long int'. I believe the C library stdint.h
defines portable types
