Phil Clayton wrote:
The Poly/ML download page
( http://www.polyml.org/download.html )
says:
./configure
make
make compiler
make
make install
Should the third make command be 'make compiler' then? (I've always
found just 'make' does nothing.)
I've updated the web page for the current SVN. T
David Matthews wrote:
One
important point to make is that you should run "make compiler" TWICE i.e.
make
make compiler
make compiler
The reason for this is that the format of exception handlers has changed
and if it is only run once there is danger that a raised exception could
encounter code
On 26/07/2010, at 6:14 PM, David Matthews wrote:
>> It's a bit difficult to provide good data at the moment, because I'm
>> travelling and have only a low-bandwidth connection to my machine in
>> the office, but I can produce more when I'm back mid Aug.
>
> Let's look into this more carefully when
Gerwin Klein wrote:
On 26/07/2010, at 1:35 PM, David Matthews wrote:
Did you rebuild the compiler before you ran with that version (i.e.
make compiler) or use the original compiler?
I checked out the svn trunk version from scratch, and did run "make
compiler".
OK. This is probably as good
On 26/07/2010, at 1:35 PM, David Matthews wrote:
> Gerwin Klein wrote:
>> Since the below I've run a few more experiments, and the theory does
>> run fine with image built after less than 25min with the current svn
>> trunk version of polyml on x86_64-darwin (5.4 Experimental).
>> However, with t
Gerwin Klein wrote:
Since the below I've run a few more experiments, and the theory does
run fine with image built after less than 25min with the current svn
trunk version of polyml on x86_64-darwin (5.4 Experimental).
However, with the polyml-3.1-fixes version, it is still running after
45min w
This looks more like a polyml issue than an Isabelle issue, so I'm reposting
here.
Since the below I've run a few more experiments, and the theory does run fine
with image built after less than 25min with the current svn trunk version of
polyml on x86_64-darwin (5.4 Experimental).
However, wit
