On 18/01/2016 10:14, Phil Clayton wrote:
The intention is that they should work correctly for negative offsets.
It seemed more useful that way. Word.toIntX does imply that the basis
library understands signed word values.
Yes - the getX/setX operations are more useful by allowing negative
off
On 16/01/2016 08:51, David Matthews wrote:
On 15/01/2016 16:13, Phil Clayton wrote:
The functions getX and setX in Foreign.Memory take an offset as a
Word.word. I'm finding that it is possible to have a negative offset by
negating the word offset, e.g.
get8 (p, ~ 0w1)
Is that guaranteed work
On 15/01/2016 16:13, Phil Clayton wrote:
The functions getX and setX in Foreign.Memory take an offset as a
Word.word. I'm finding that it is possible to have a negative offset by
negating the word offset, e.g.
get8 (p, ~ 0w1)
Is that guaranteed work generally?
Given that
Word.wordSize = 6
The functions getX and setX in Foreign.Memory take an offset as a
Word.word. I'm finding that it is possible to have a negative offset by
negating the word offset, e.g.
get8 (p, ~ 0w1)
Is that guaranteed work generally?
Given that
Word.wordSize = 63
SysWord.wordSize = 64
I wouldn't have
