Re: [polyml] Isabelle/ML IDE (update)

2014-10-03 Thread Tjark Weber
On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 23:19 +0200, Makarius wrote: We also need to find out how many people are still there to use SML. So far there are already 9 supporters on http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2036744/ml-ide-and-compiler-for-windows-or-linux-or-mac and the green tick has changed as

Re: [polyml] Isabelle/ML IDE (update)

2014-10-03 Thread Ramana Kumar
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Tjark Weber tjark.we...@it.uu.se wrote: Further note that print is also not Standard ML, although TextIO.print is covered by the Basis Library. In what sense is print not Standard ML? In the same way use is not Standard ML (although as Makarius points out,

Re: [polyml] Isabelle/ML IDE (update)

2014-10-03 Thread Tjark Weber
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 15:32 +0100, Ramana Kumar wrote: On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Tjark Weber tjark.we...@it.uu.se wrote: Further note that print is also not Standard ML, although TextIO.print is covered by the Basis Library. In what sense is print not

Re: [polyml] Isabelle/ML IDE (update)

2014-10-02 Thread Makarius
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Tjark Weber wrote: 1. I suspect that the ITP aspect of Isabelle may put off people who just want to write SML code. (For instance, there are many documents and panels visible in the UI that are entirely irrelevant to SML programming.) If you had unlimited time, I would