On 14 Dec 2009, at 18:33, David Matthews wrote:
> Rob,
>
> Rob Arthan wrote:
>> For what it is worth, I have attached a patch that fixes PolyML.install_pp.
>> On reflection, if you withdraw it, I am going to have to write something
>> similar of my own, because I can't see any other way of mai
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Rob Arthan wrote:
For what it is worth, I have attached a patch that fixes
PolyML.install_pp. On reflection, if you withdraw it, I am going to have
to write something similar of my own, because I can't see any other way
of maintaining compatibility with both Poly/ML and SM
Rob,
Rob Arthan wrote:
For what it is worth, I have attached a patch that fixes
PolyML.install_pp. On reflection, if you withdraw it, I am going to have
to write something similar of my own, because I can't see any other way
of maintaining compatibility with both Poly/ML and SML/NJ.
I realis
David,
For what it is worth, I have attached a patch that fixes
PolyML.install_pp. On reflection, if you withdraw it, I am going to have
to write something similar of my own, because I can't see any other way
of maintaining compatibility with both Poly/ML and SML/NJ.
Regards,
Rob.
--- mlsou
Rob Arthan wrote:
Thanks for responding so promptly with documentation for the new scheme.
I have a query about this extract from your document:
"The consistent parameter indicates whether the block is to be broken
consistently (true) or not (false). If it is true then if the block will
not a
David,
Thanks for responding so promptly with documentation for the new scheme.
I have a query about this extract from your document:
"The consistent parameter indicates whether the block is to be broken
consistently (true) or not (false). If it is true then if the block will
not all fit on
Rob,
I think the problem is actually with the wrapper function that is used
to emulate install_pp in terms of addPrettyPrinter. When I wrote a
version of your pretty printer directly in the new form (included below)
it worked as expected. I've now written a quick document describing the
new
I can't find any documentation for the new approach to pretty-printing
in version 5.3 of Poly/ML. For ProofPower, I am using the
PolyML.install_pp interface that is provided for backwards
compatibility. but it doesn't seem to give the same results. I find that
many things that used to print nic
