On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Mouse wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:24:29 +0200
From: Mouse mo...@rodents-montreal.org
To: pool@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: [Pool] Taking down my NTP server in Turkey
Sender: pool-bounces+henkp=cs.uu...@lists.ntp.org
They're using the tr country-code zone? Then I have
On Thursday 02 August 2012, Henk P. Penning wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Mouse wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:24:29 +0200
From: Mouse mo...@rodents-montreal.org
To: pool@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: [Pool] Taking down my NTP server in Turkey
Sender:
I currently have 3 servers assigned to another zone.
Can they be added to the .tr zone too?
- Gerardo Perales
-Original Message-
From: pool-bounces+gerardo.perales=axtel.com...@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:pool-bounces+gerardo.perales=axtel.com...@lists.ntp.org] On Behalf Of
Svavar Kjarrval
Hi there,
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Rob Oats wrote:
Do yourself a favour and save your sympathy for someone or something more
deserving.
Couldn't agree more. Do yourselves a favour and firewall Turkey.
--
73,
Ged.
___
pool mailing list
Op 3-8-2012 15:59, Svavar Kjarrval schreef:
If it's ok that a server is in England, then I can donate it to the zone
for now.
- Svavar Kjarrval
On 02/08/12 15:32, Henk P. Penning wrote:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Mouse wrote:
pool@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/pool
Yes, it's okay to
Hi everyone,
Blocking Turk Telekom customers/devices from using the pool is an option and if
at some point supporting them becomes unsustainable we'll figure out how to do
it. As long as we can sustain it, I'd rather we do that.
Obviously getting a contact there who can help would be much
- The job of the NTP Pool is to be the first choice when needing
basic NTP service. It's the whole reason we're doing this.
True. I sometimes lose sight of that.
However - and here I should emphasize that this is a strictly personal
viewpoint - I am interested in helping others on the net
On Thursday, August 2, 2012 at 1:22 PM, AlbyVA wrote:
I've been planning to add something to to the system so it checks for
correct leap second announcements, it looks like I shouldn't wait until the
next leap second before doing it.
Can you link those findings to something on each