On Wednesday, August 1. 2012, 19:27:06 Maurice Janssen wrote:
Did you compensate for the delay of the radio signal? Radio waves
travel at about 300,000 km/s which is equivalent with a delay of
3.3 ms / 1000 km.
If you are located in Iceland (judging by the TLD of your email
address),
On Wednesday, August 1. 2012, 16:43:16 Matej Snoha wrote:
Hi.
A few months ago I did a sweep over servers listed at
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Servers/StratumOneTimeServers .
Out of the 183 reachable servers,
122 (67%) had offset = 5 ms
156 (85%) had offset = 10 ms
174 (95%) had
Don't overestimate how accurate the monitoring system is. There are lots of
factors that can shift the accuracy by a few tens of ms from time to time. If
your server is in agreement with various well run servers (nearby and farther
away) then trust that.
The monitoring system isn't intended
On Thursday, August 2, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Kiss Gábor wrote:
What if the monitoring system Asks (sorry :) the server's
own estimation about its offset? (I mean value 1.780 below) (If possible.)
It depends less on _your_ network environment and probably
more realistic than a single poll from you.
Hi.
Yesterday I gathered some statistics about (IPv4) servers in the pool.
I'm posting them here, since at least the offset part seems on topic.
Offset (absolute value) measured against my stratum 2 in Prague. I used
ntpdate, so it might not be that accurate.
Out of 2348 servers:
@lists.ntp.org
[pool-bounces+tshoppa=wmata@lists.ntp.org] on behalf of n...@jama.is
[n...@jama.is]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 4:59 AM
To: pool@lists.ntp.org
Subject: [Pool] Question about precision I can expect
Hi,
after reading the The NTP Pool needs more servers call for joining the
ntp.org
Hi.
A few months ago I did a sweep over servers listed at
http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Servers/StratumOneTimeServers .
Out of the 183 reachable servers,
122 (67%) had offset = 5 ms
156 (85%) had offset = 10 ms
174 (95%) had offset = 20 ms
9 had offset 20 ms
1 had offset 10 s
(measured
