Hello Anthony
On 13.07.2011 19:17, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
I was asking myself if this could have any impact for ntpd which
use a GPS receiver as time source.
You wouldn't have to keep updating the leapseconds file, that's all.
This is the main advantage I also see and this would make
I was asking myself if this could have any impact for ntpd which
use a GPS receiver as time source.
You wouldn't have to keep updating the leapseconds file, that's all.
As GPS satellite are
geostationary,
Except for the FAA's WAAS, this is not true; the GPS satellites are all
in medium
I do not know, if this is the right place to ask/report this. But I think,
that some knowledgeable people are reading this mailing list.
..
The best place to discuss this is probably the leapseconds list at:
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/leapsecs
There has been a lot of
On Jul 13, 2011, at 12:38, Hal Murray wrote:
Leap seconds works terribly in practice -- at least according to the pool
system monitoring during the last one. (And that's not even counting the
obvious problem of having two seconds with the same timestamp!).
