Re: [CVS] RPM: popt/ popt.pc.in

2009-08-12 Thread devzero2000
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote: On Aug 12, 2009, at 4:01 AM, devzero2000 wrote: But I otherwise agree that popt.pc is more useful if -L is contained within. This is the link https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529921 Thanks for the link.

Re: [CVS] RPM: popt/ popt.pc.in

2009-08-12 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Aug 12, 2009, at 10:47 AM, devzero2000 wrote: Sorry if i disgress, but i want take advantage of your attention. It might be useful to migrate the autofu popt to version 2 of autoconf / automake? It is something I can certainly do, if you agree. I prefer to ask first. Feel free to