Hello all,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Robert Scheck wrote:
attached is a patch by Panu Matilainen who provided a patch to Fedora to
return something semi-meaningful on exec alias fail. But as I am not a C
developer, I do not have any clue if this patch is good or bad. However it
is applied
this option if this tiny patch is refused after
a review.
Greetings,
Robert
Patch by Robert Scheck rob...@fedoraproject.org for popt = 1.16 which changes
$(pkgconfigdir) on 64 bit systems from /usr/lib/pkgconfig to
/usr/lib64/pkgconfig.
Using $(libdir)/pkgconfig rather $(prefix)/lib/pkgconfig seems
Hello all,
I am forwarding a message of Christoph Anton Mitterer (Cc'ed) which was
reported at Red Hat Bugzilla. However this does not feel for me like a
downstream thing but more relevant for popt upstream, thus relaying it:
- Forwarded message -
Hi.
Popt has apparently problems with
Hello all,
I am forwarding a message of Christoph Anton Mitterer (Cc'ed) which was
reported at Red Hat Bugzilla. However this does not feel for me like a
downstream thing but more relevant for popt upstream, thus relaying it:
- Forwarded message -
Hi.
The popt(3) manpage does basically
Hello all,
I am forwarding a message of Christoph Anton Mitterer (Cc'ed) which was
reported at Red Hat Bugzilla. However this does not feel for me like a
downstream thing but more relevant for popt upstream, thus relaying it:
- Forwarded message -
Hi.
The manpage has the following table
Hello Jeff,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
My brainfart, sorry. The 1st patch I applied made the changes and I got
tricked.
Now checked in.
awesome, thank you!
Greetings,
Robert
pgpDQ8bcfzb8W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Jeff,
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
There's perhaps portability issues moving to later AutoFu
(but I use autoconf 2.69 all the time in popt).
Likely the easiest fix is to rerun autogen.sh (or use autoreconf):
you could just do that on aarch64 as well.
Will that work?
Good evening...
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Jeff Johnson wrote:
All that remains AFAIK is to finish integrating UTF-8 and POPT_fprintf()
patches.
'Twould be nice to find bugs before, not immediately after, release. ;-)
Okay, here we go what looks strange to me with popt 1.14 from your possible
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote:
I burned DVD, installed Fedora 8 and could reproduced your problem.
Some of applications do not set bind_textdomain_codeset().
I think the attached patch will fix your main problem with removing your
change of the workaround.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, Takao Fujiwara wrote:
When I run rpm --help or kudzu --help on [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale in
Fedora 7,
I don't find any problems.
Fedora 7 has popt delivered with rpm, so it's an old popt version which
never saw your changes. And all popt packages I officially prepared for
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote:
Robert Scheck wrote:
Fedora 7 has popt delivered with rpm, so it's an old popt version which
never saw your changes. And all popt packages I officially prepared for
Fedora 8 are currently undoing your changes per patch to avoid
11 matches
Mail list logo
