Re: Test failure for popt 1.16

2010-05-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
Actually the previous patch is bogus. Right idea, just the wrong way to fix. Try this patch instead: Index: popthelp.c === RCS file: /v/rpm/cvs/popt/popthelp.c,v retrieving revision 1.94 diff -p -u -w -r1.94 popthelp.c --- popthelp.c

Re: Test failure for popt 1.16

2010-05-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
On May 10, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Pieter Bowman wrote: > I did builds of popt 1.16 on a number of our systems here. Test 59 > failed on a number of the systems with the following output: > The "fix" for the failure in popt-1.16 "make check" is likely (I have easy no easy means of testing across all

Re: Test failure for popt 1.16

2010-05-11 Thread Jeff Johnson
This is largely a cosmetic issue introduced by using libtool (i.e. "test1" != "lt-test1"in argv[0]). But yes, could/should be fixed. 73 de Jeff On May 10, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Pieter Bowman wrote: > I did builds of popt 1.16 on a number of our systems here. Test 59 > failed on a number of the sys

Test failure for popt 1.16

2010-05-11 Thread Pieter Bowman
I did builds of popt 1.16 on a number of our systems here. Test 59 failed on a number of the systems with the following output: Test "test1 --usage" failed with: "Usage: test1 [-I?] [-c|--cb2=STRING] [--arg1] [-2|--arg2=ARG] [-3|--arg3=ANARG] [-onedash] [--optional=STRING] [--val]