On Dec 24, 2012, at 8:34 PM, zzs zzs...@126.com wrote:
Auto document in popt is very good.
But when I want the document of a option have serval paragraphs
It output bad things.
My option define like this:
{
.longName = fre,
.shortName = '\0',
.descrip=
On May 2, 2013, at 5:56 PM, Karl Lindén wrote:
Hello!
I am memory checking a program using the popt library but it seems as
there is some kind of memory leak in poptGetNextOpt. I have written a
small test program to show the issue. The program will basically just
take an integer argument
The problem cannot be documented for POPT_ARG_ARGV
because the behavior is dependent on how POPT is built.
Traditionally (to minimize memory fragmentation), an ARGV
array was allocated in one continuous memory chunk so
that a single free released both the array and all the strings.
Depending on
Are you entering unicode directly into popt table strings?
If so, then use gettext(3) and a N_(...) wrapper.
There are still issues with unicode and alignment: popt does not use
wide characters (which were largely non-existent outside of M$ when
popt was written).
The remaining issues cannot be
On Aug 26, 2014, at 6:28 AM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
http://yum.jbj.org/pub/centos6/SRPMS.i386/popt-1.17-1.src.rpm
http://yum.jbj.org/pub/centos6/SRPMS.i386/popt-1.17-1.src.rpm
typo (centos-6, not centos6)
http://yum.jbj.org/pub/centos-6/SRPMS.i386/popt-1.17-1.src.rpm
On Aug 25, 2014, at 9:51 PM, Benedikt Morbach
benedikt.morb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello list,
would it be possible to cut a new popt release to make life for
downstream distributions a little bit easier?
Here is popt-1.17 staged for release:
> On Oct 20, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Alex Kashchenko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was building popt-1.13 for windows, it does not work out of the box, but
> fixes are straightforward except the following one:
>
> diff --git a/src/poptint.c b/src/poptint.c
> index e99d28b..1b5fd9f