On Jun 20, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
>>
>> I can/will chase down a "straw-man" implementation using loader maps
>> and versioned symbols for "compatibility" over the next month
>> because I _REALLY_ think renaming to "popt2" is just wussiness.
>
> fwiw, I've found more than one
popt-devel-ow...@rpm5.org wrote:
> There's a thread on gcrypt-devel that is directly
> relevant to POPT library "compatibility" and symbol handling:
>
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gcrypt-devel
>
> (You will get a "403 Forbidden" for the gcrypt-devel archives,
> go find a mirror
