Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date

2024-05-21 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainers, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more unmaintained ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. Please consider also adopting this

The builder for http://beefy12.nyi.freebsd.org/ is stuck (14/amd64)

2024-05-21 Thread Yuri
It finished the last rebuild cycle a few days ago, and now it is just idle for several days. It should probably keep cycling automatically. Yuri

Re: Request for help: neovim-0.10.0

2024-05-21 Thread Laurent
You're welcome! On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 11:43, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Thank you so, so much Laurent!! > > — > Adam Weinberger > ad...@adamw.org > https://www.adamw.org > > On May 19, 2024, at 23:21, Laurent wrote: > >  > I've started *Bug 279175* >

Re: Fwd: [package - 140amd64-default][security/softether-devel] Failed for softether-devel-4.43.9799.b in build

2024-05-21 Thread Koichiro Iwao
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:58:20AM UTC, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Koichiro Iwao writes: > > pkg-fallout reports the following build error. However, it builds > > perfectly on my local poudriere setup. Could anyone have an idea > > about the difference between local poudriere vs build farm? >

Re: Fwd: [package - 140amd64-default][security/softether-devel] Failed for softether-devel-4.43.9799.b in build

2024-05-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Koichiro Iwao writes: > pkg-fallout reports the following build error. However, it builds > perfectly on my local poudriere setup. Could anyone have an idea > about the difference between local poudriere vs build farm? Parallelization. The upstream Makefile assumes that the sources are