FIX: net/icecast suffers from the same moronic snprintf() patch :-(

2005-08-23 Thread Moritz Grimm
Hello, first off, it's hard to express how annoyed and sorry I am about all this, especially because it's all way too late. Please accept my apologies. Icecast uses the same function as libshout; slightly different name, different purpose, same shit with the patch ... in the case of

snprintf() revisited, please comment

2005-08-23 Thread Moritz Grimm
Hello again, since I originally made my patches and especially during the course of dealing with the recent issues, I learned quite a lot. With my current understanding of things, I doubt the usefulness and validity of many parts of the patches and hope to solicit some comments about the

lang/pm3 build fails with runtime error

2005-08-23 Thread Bernd Schoeller
Hi, has anybody successfully compiled lang/pm3 on i386 ? When I try to build this package (cd /usr/ports/lang/pm3 ; make), I get the following error -- lots of output skipped gmake[1]: Leaving directory

Re: lang/pm3 build fails with runtime error

2005-08-23 Thread J. Lievisse Adriaanse
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:28:35 +0200 Bernd Schoeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, has anybody successfully compiled lang/pm3 on i386 ? When I try to build this package (cd /usr/ports/lang/pm3 ; make), I get the following error

Re: lang/pm3 build fails with runtime error

2005-08-23 Thread Bernd Schoeller
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 05:43:18PM +0200, J. Lievisse Adriaanse wrote: If you've read the Makefilethan you would've found out that is was marked broken. Oh - had not update the ports since 2005/08/09, sorry for that. Ok, I found out the hard way. Still, if anybody has managed to compile

Re: lang/pm3 build fails with runtime error

2005-08-23 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Bernd Schoeller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I found out the hard way. Still, if anybody has managed to compile pm3 with some manual intervention, I would appreciate any helpful hints. How big are the chances that it will ever work again (how big was the stat () API change) ?

Re: snprintf() revisited, please comment

2005-08-23 Thread Ted Unangst
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Moritz Grimm wrote: While I wouldn't use sprintf() in any new code of my own, this does look safe to me. If my assumption of this being safe is correct, then patching it to use snprintf() is redundant and adds code that can contain bugs (that's what happened to me.) This