Re: www/snownews

2005-11-03 Thread Alf Schlichting
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:59:53PM +, David Cathcart wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 08:00:10PM +0100, Aleksander Piotrowski wrote: Alf Schlichting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /usr/ports/www/snownews dumped core recently. Maybe just version that we've in ports tree is broken? PLease

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-03 Thread hanz
Hans van Leeuwen wrote: After reading packages-specs(7) I managed to fix the problem. Could you please test this new version? It still works fine for me under macppc. _But_ I do have a question though. pkg_check reports that the following installed packages is affected by a vulnerability:

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-03 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This not handled by pkg_check. I guess the package management system can't figure out that mc-4.6.1p0 is greater than mc-4.6.1pre1p0. The RFC Marc Espie just posted tackles this problem. Well, it defeats the purpose of pkg_check then... Anyway, I hope a better

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread hanz
In order to get you more confused, we've got more bright ideas about version numbering... Right now, we mostly use the `vendor' number scheme, and we add a simple p* suffix to denote what's going on with the OpenBSD port. As we've noticed, some times, vendor version numbers go backwards, or

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:34:21AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:04:15 +0100, Marc Espie wrote: Opinions ? If you dared to be radical, you'd split the name into 3 parts: generic name - human readable version - unix time. That would read python-expat-2.3.5-1131013320

Re: NEW: pkg_check

2005-11-03 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:09:22 +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: Quick guess because you need a ports tree. Of course, there was something I overlooked ! On the other hand, cvs remains the 'master', and instead of manually updating a reference site, would it not be better and simpler to refer

Re: sidebar patch for mutt

2005-11-03 Thread Bernd Ahlers
Hi Jolan, Jolan Luff [Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:38:01PM -0600] wrote: dlg@ and marco@ saw this screenshot of mutt with a sidebar that has a folder list with new msg counts: http://vorlon.cwru.edu/~jrh29/mutt/mutt_shot_patch8.png they promised me beer if i included it so here's a diff to the port

Re: sidebar patch for mutt

2005-11-03 Thread Hannah Schroeter
Hello! On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:38:01PM -0600, Jolan Luff wrote: [...] they promised me beer if i included it so here's a diff to the port which adds the sidebar patch as a FLAVOR. all the config stuff is listed on the website for the patch, http://thomer.com/mutt/. the website is referenced

Re: sidebar patch for mutt

2005-11-03 Thread Bernd Ahlers
Hannah Schroeter [Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:24:08PM +0100] wrote: Can one disable/enable the sidebar in the sidebar FLAVOR by using a configuration option, or is this a compile-time only setting? You can make it visible, invisible with a macro/keybinding. macro index S 'enter-commandtoggle

Mozilla Firefox 1.5rc1

2005-11-03 Thread Peter Strömberg
tested on i386, amd64 and macppc in venice patch -E is recomended mozilla-firefox-1.5rc1.diff.gz Description: application/gunzip

SourceForge screwed up games/scummvm

2005-11-03 Thread Moritz Grimm
Hi, seeing the updated BASS, I felt like playing it again. During the install, I ran into this: --- snip --- === Verifying install for scummvm-=0.5.1 in games/scummvm === Checking files for scummvm-0.8.0 scummvm-0.8.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. Fetch

Re: mozilla-firefox += README.OpenBSD

2005-11-03 Thread Kurt Miller
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 02:19 pm, Ray Lai wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 01:18:47PM -0500, Ian Darwin wrote: +Firefox looks for plugins in ~/.mozilla/plugins and in the directorie(s) named +in the environment variable MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH. I think `directories' is better than

Re: sidebar patch for mutt

2005-11-03 Thread Marco Peereboom
This is really neat and worth a beer. The only downer is that it doesn't work with imap, so if someone else is thirsty... FWIW, you have my ok. On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:15:11PM -0600, Jolan Luff wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:38:01PM -0600, Jolan Luff wrote: hi, dlg@ and marco@ saw

Latest gtk+2

2005-11-03 Thread Marc Matteo
Ok, so I haven't been completely slacking... just maybe mostly slacking. Here's my latest rendition of gtk+2 and friends: glib2-2.8.3: http://www.lectroid.net/ports/glib2.diff pango-1.10.1: http://www.lectroid.net/ports/pango.diff gtk+2-2.8.6: http://www.lectroid.net/ports/gtk+2.diff

Re: SourceForge screwed up games/scummvm

2005-11-03 Thread Bernd Ahlers
David Krause [Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:36:51AM -0600] wrote: I send a patch to fix this a while back but received no comments. The wrong exit code is being tested. Go ahead, commit. It works. Bernd Index: infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread Andrew Dalgleish
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:04:35AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:34:21AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: If you dared to be radical, you'd split the name into 3 parts: generic name - human readable version - unix time. That would read python-expat-2.3.5-1131013320 [snip]

Re: SourceForge screwed up games/scummvm

2005-11-03 Thread Moritz Grimm
David Krause wrote: I send a patch to fix this a while back but received no comments. The wrong exit code is being tested. - test `wc -c $$file 2/dev/null|awk '{print $$1}' || echo 0` -lt 3 rm -f $$file; \ +

policy about /usr/local/package_basename

2005-11-03 Thread Moritz Grimm
Hi, I would like to know more about the policy concerning path names like /usr/local/mozilla-firefox. My personal interpretation of things is that it's like this (concerning the official tree): ``In general, using a subdirectory directly below $PREFIX is not allowed and packages should

Re: policy about /usr/local/package_basename

2005-11-03 Thread Nikolay Sturm
* Moritz Grimm [2005-11-03]: Is this how it is? yes

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 03:38:50AM +1100, Andrew Dalgleish wrote: On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:04:35AM +0100, Marc Espie wrote: On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:34:21AM +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote: If you dared to be radical, you'd split the name into 3 parts: generic name - human readable version -

Attention: work in progress

2005-11-03 Thread Marc Espie
People using ports, be aware that there is a *lot* of ports activity this week. For instance, if you manage to get your pkg_* tools and your ports tree out of synch, you will lose. And you might run into bugs as well... No warranty this week ! Things will slow down next week, probably...

Re: Mozilla Firefox 1.5rc1

2005-11-03 Thread dorqus
Peter Strömberg wrote... tested on i386, amd64 and macppc in venice patch -E is recomended Seems to be working for me, i386-current using October 30th snapshot. Thanks! -- josh

Re: policy about /usr/local/package_basename

2005-11-03 Thread Marc Espie
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 08:08:38PM +0100, Moritz Grimm wrote: Hi, I would like to know more about the policy concerning path names like /usr/local/mozilla-firefox. My personal interpretation of things is that it's like this (concerning the official tree): ``In general, using a

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread andrew fresh
As a 'user' I would like a way to tell easily if a package is for 3.7, 3.8, or current, especially when someone else was supposed to have upgraded a server. However, I wouldn't like it to have to be a part of the Makefile as that would be a PAIN to update. So if when packing, it could look at

Asterisk on Sparc64 fails with bus error

2005-11-03 Thread Steve Murdoch
# pwd /usr/ports/telephony/asterisk # uname -a OpenBSD butters.murdoch-technology.com.au 3.8 GENERIC#607 sparc64 # make show=MAINTAINER The OpenBSD ports mailing-list ports@openbsd.org # # asterisk -c Asterisk 1.0.9, Copyright (C) 1999-2004 Digium. Written by Mark Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: UPDATE: graphics/cairo

2005-11-03 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Aleksander Piotrowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on i386, make regress gives me: 9 of 63 tests failed. Good! 1.0.0 had 15/59 failures Yeah, six tests fixed and now please fix the rest. Including the five that are expected to fail? Tall order. Come on guys, don't discourage

Re: Mozilla Firefox 1.5rc1

2005-11-03 Thread Kurt Miller
On Thursday 03 November 2005 08:24 am, Peter Strömberg wrote: tested on i386, amd64 and macppc in venice patch -E is recomended Tested on sparc64 with remote X ok. Themes working ok, but I haven't found an extension that is 1.5rc1 compatible. Anyone know of one? -Kurt

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 15:49:39 -0700, andrew fresh wrote: Human readable, date based serials would be nice as that is something easy to recognize and compare. If the serial was human readable, I don't think there would be a need for the p* numbers as with the serial, you would know which was

Mplayer - dual cpu crash

2005-11-03 Thread Roy Morris
I am running 3.7-stable. If I use mplayer with a single cpu kernel it works fine. As soon as I use the .mp kernel mplayer borks with the following error. Just thought you'd like to know. Thanks Roy oa:/home/rmorris$ mplayer dvd://1-4 -cache 8096 MPlayer

Re: Snort

2005-11-03 Thread Randal T. Rioux
I was about to do the same. Let me know if you don't hear back within a reasonable time. Perhaps we can do some collaboration. Randy Martin Ekendahl wrote: Is anyone working on updating the snorts port? I contacted the maintainer but haven't heard back. Want to make sure I don't encroach on

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread Marc Matteo
On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:04 PM, Marc Espie wrote: The main objection you can have is that this is too complicated, but so far, we haven't been able to find any hole in that scheme... Opinions ? It's too complicated :). Actually it's not, but it'll confuse the folks adding packages. How

Teleseminari e Corsi

2005-11-03 Thread PNL3 Corsi
= PNL3, Coaching, Comunicazione Ipnotica: Conoscenze Pratiche e Manuali ISI-CNV 03/11/2005 = Visita ed iscriviti a http://www.pnl-nlp.org/dn/ Vedi i Prossimi corsi più sotto: MILANO 11-13 Novembre oppure ROMA 03-04 Dicembre inoltre:

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 11:04:35 +0100, Marc Espie wrote: This does not take care of branch issues... started to think and don't see this. File: abiword-2.2.11.tgz8160 KB 01/11/0514:41:00 File: abiword-2.2.9.tgz 8159 KB 04/09/0519:19:00 Why are there

Re: RFC changes in version numbering schemes

2005-11-03 Thread Bernd Ahlers
Marc Matteo [Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 08:28:00PM -0800] wrote: How about something that RPM does (or used to do, it's been a while) is use an *internal* version number in cases like this. It's basically the same thing as the v* idea only it's hidden in the Makefile. So in the gcc case instead