More no_x11 fun, this time with nmap. Nmap depends on libdnet,
which depends on Python (huh?), which depends on Tk, which depends on X.
Building a no_python flavor of libdnet first solves the problem...
Regards,
Liviu Daia
--
Dr. Liviu Daia
On 20 May 2006, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Liviu Daia [2006-05-20, 10:20:54]:
More no_x11 fun, this time with nmap. Nmap depends on libdnet,
which depends on Python (huh?), which depends on Tk, which depends
on X. Building a no_python flavor of libdnet first solves the
Liviu Daia dixit (2006-05-20, 10:26:02):
Is building from ports still supported on OpenBSD?
I don't think it was ever supported...
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgVsPorts
--
Florin Iamandi (Slippery)
Reason is the first victim of emotion. -- Scytale, Dune Messiah
On May 19, 2006, at 2:52 PM, marius wrote:
Hi Chad,
I had the same problem installing another port dependant on Python. I
found that installing tk-8.4.7 first, and then restarting the previous
installation made it go away.
I got it working. I first cleaned up python, then tk, then built
Joachim Schipper wrote:
OTOH, it is expected you either know what you are doing or just install
packages - and in fact, if you do know what you are doing, you typically
*still* install packages.
Or, maybe, if you know what you are doing, you still install ports, for
their IMHO better method
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:24:47AM +0100, Keith Matthews wrote:
On Sat, 20 May 2006 10:44:23 +0200
steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. People who build ports are expected to have all filesets installed,
including X.
Oh, where is this documented please ?
Well, for one, it's all
On Saturday 20 May 2006 19:05, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Or, maybe, if you know what you are doing, you still install ports, for
their IMHO better method of updating.
No, packages has a better method. make install for a port will not update an
already installed port.
There's a reason Theo, Espie etc
Lars Hansson wrote:
No, packages has a better method.
Since you are up-to-date, please share with me: which ?
make install for a port will not update an
already installed port.
True. make clean won't neither. But make update does. Surprised ?
If you cant figure that out by yourself
Lars Hansson [2006-05-20, 20:26:14]:
Something along the lines of In case you want to use ports later, you
will need X even on a non-X system to satisfy dependencies. in the
Installation-FAQ will remedy the situation for newcomers proactively.
Except that you dont need X to build ports.
On 20 May 2006, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Liviu Daia [2006-05-20, 11:23:29]:
[...]
Is building from ports still supported on OpenBSD?
Yes. People who build ports are expected to have all filesets
installed, including X.
Having used OpenBSD for 7+ years, 3.9 is the
On Sat, 20 May 2006 15:14:55 +0200
steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lars Hansson [2006-05-20, 20:26:14]:
Something along the lines of In case you want to use ports later, you
will need X even on a non-X system to satisfy dependencies. in the
Installation-FAQ will remedy the
On Saturday 20 May 2006 21:29, Keith Matthews wrote:
And not so long ago there was a no_x11 version of tk.
There has never been a no_x11 version of Tk. Ever.
---
Lars Hansson
Hi.
Since all files in /etc/raddb are readable by anyone (and those might
contain passwords), I propose this very little change to the freeradius
port.
Regards,
--
Antoine Jacoutot
Observatoire de Paris
SIO - Centre de calcul (Bat 15)
5, Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
Tel : +33
On 5/18/06, Toni Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
attached you find my attempt at porting Safe::Hole.
This module allows you to call subroutines defined outside of a Safe
compartment within the context of where they were defined (ie,
bypassing the rules for the Safe compartment for
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 09:44:51PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
On Saturday 20 May 2006 21:29, Keith Matthews wrote:
And not so long ago there was a no_x11 version of tk.
There has never been a no_x11 version of Tk. Ever.
There has, however, been a no-Tk version ('no_tkinter') of python for a
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 06:27:38AM -0400, Chad M Stewart wrote:
On May 19, 2006, at 2:52 PM, marius wrote:
Hi Chad,
I had the same problem installing another port dependant on Python. I
found that installing tk-8.4.7 first, and then restarting the previous
installation made it go away.
On Saturday 20 May 2006 10:23, Liviu Daia wrote:
On 20 May 2006, steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Liviu Daia [2006-05-20, 10:20:54]:
More no_x11 fun, this time with nmap. Nmap depends on libdnet,
which depends on Python (huh?), which depends on Tk, which depends
on X.
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 07:16:47PM +0200, Johan Torin wrote:
On Saturday 20 May 2006 15:03, Lars Hansson wrote:
What make update does is eactly what the pkg tools does, ie pkg_add -r so
it's neather better or worse. Well, it's worse because you need to install
the entire ports tree and
18 matches
Mail list logo
