My apologies if this has been asked earlier and I missed out in the
archives/ FAQ.
I am using OpenBSD 3.9 -release with the -release branch of the ports
tree (ports.tar.gz downloaded from the 3.9 FTP directory). I undestand
that if I do cd /usr/ports cvs -q up -dP -rOPENBSD_3_9 it would
bring
Rui Reis [2006-06-08, 19:27:44]:
Here's an update to net/tor.
http://www.openbsd-pt.com/ports/tor-0.1.1.20.diff
Changelog available here: http://tor.eff.org/cvs/tor/ChangeLog
Works for me on i386, sparc64 and amd64.
Please test and comment.
make regress fails; it passes for the in tree
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:07:17AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
My apologies if this has been asked earlier and I missed out in the
archives/ FAQ.
I am using OpenBSD 3.9 -release with the -release branch of the ports
tree (ports.tar.gz downloaded from the 3.9 FTP directory). I undestand
Start with pkg_add -u, and go from there. OpenBSD mostly uses packages.
There is also a ports(7) command to do this, but it escapes me at the
moment.
Yup. My question was for those packages that dont have a package
equivalent and needs updating thru ports. :)
Thanks,
Rakhesh
--
Hi Rakhesh,
There is also a ports(7) command to do this, but it escapes me at the
moment.
Yup. My question was for those packages that dont have a package
equivalent and needs updating thru ports. :)
/usr/ports/infrastructure/build/out-of-date, perhaps?
HTH... Nico
hi,
I see lots of new ports not applied to the official ports
tree. does somebody run a unofficial OBPkg package server?
steffen
Will imitating different archs with qemu-system-* provide valid results
for the new/updated ports testing?
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:11:38 +0200
steven mestdagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rui Reis [2006-06-08, 19:27:44]:
Here's an update to net/tor.
http://www.openbsd-pt.com/ports/tor-0.1.1.20.diff
Changelog available here: http://tor.eff.org/cvs/tor/ChangeLog
Works for me on i386, sparc64
here is an update to my previously posted www/mozilla-seamonkey port,
as before, tested only only on i386 though should work on other platforms
where firefox/thunderbird work.
also available at:
http://blogs.loveandnature.co.za/www/openbsd-ports/
www-seamonkey.tgz
Description: Binary data
Hello!!!
Why when I compiling courier-authlib with vpopmail it don't create
libauthvchkpw.so.0.0 in the
/usr/courier-auth/lib/courier-auth/lib directory?
The configure options of vpopmail are:
./configure \
--disable-roaming-users \
--enable-logging=p \
--disable-ip-alias-domains \
* Marco Spiga wrote:
Hello!
Howto I can install php with pkg_add in OpenBSD3.9?
you should really read some manual pages. there is excellent
documentation available, maybe start with
$ man pkg_add
and make sure to read the fine FAQ.
(excuse my english it's not my mother language)
Hi,
It's my first post for a package so tell me if I doing something wrong.
There is an update for unrar (0.5.4 - 0.6.4):
http://jcabillot.free.fr/openbsd/unrar.diff
Changelog: http://www.rarlab.com/rarnew.htm
It works for me on i386.
Please test
Sounds very strange if all versions are correct.
Make sure that both patch and javafiles have correct versionNbrs.
If it still doesn't work out I suggest java 5. You don't have any
reason to play with earlier more than maybe lack of diskspace. You
will get lots of generic fancy stuff with 5.0
Bachman Kharazmi wrote:
Sounds very strange if all versions are correct.
Make sure that both patch and javafiles have correct versionNbrs.
If it still doesn't work out I suggest java 5. You don't have any
reason to play with earlier more than maybe lack of diskspace. You
will get lots of
Oh, sorry William, you did respond a bit before me :-)
Here's a new diff: http://www.openbsd-pt.com/ports/tor-0.1.1.20.diff
problem found and fixed after some brainstorming with Nick Mathewson,
tor developer.
his cvs commit here:
http://archives.seul.org/or/cvs/Jun-2006/msg00077.html
Please test and comment.
Rui Reis
On Fri, 9 Jun 2006 18:00:50
Ok, I totally miss the word beta.
So the good way is to contact the maintainer before the list, right ?
On 6/9/06, Rui Reis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
According to the changelog and if I'm not mistaken that's a beta
version, right?
So, I wouldn't be in a hurry to make the update. I would wait
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html
I assume that that list is not limited to just binary packages? Even
those available *only* in the ports are included?
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html
I assume that that list is not limited to just binary packages? Even
those available *only* in the ports are included?
Since a package is built from a port then by looking at that list you
can find out what ports have been updated.
Except that some
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:30:11AM +0900, vladas wrote:
Will imitating different archs with qemu-system-* provide valid results
for the new/updated ports testing?
Why not?
Tobias
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 04:35:16AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote:
http://www.openbsd.org/pkg-stable.html
I assume that that list is not limited to just binary packages? Even
those available *only* in the ports are included?
Since a package is built from a port then by looking at that
Hi,
I am quite double-minds about posting this question, for fear of
starting some GNOME vs KDE discussion. But I am curious. I see that
the ports have the latest version of KDE (kde-3.5) compared to a
not-so-latest version of GNOME (gnome-2.10). Any reason why things are
that way?
Is it
22 matches
Mail list logo
