I did not found this module in our ports tree, so here it is
port can be fetched from http://84.32.234.78/ports/p5-Apache-Reload.tar.gz
Selon Andreas Vögele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'll update the patch for SpamAssassin 3.1.7 that I sent to
the list yesterday. I don't think that we have to keep
these changes separate.
Here is a diff for spamassassin that :
- update to version 3.1.7 (by Andreas Vögele, with some cleanings)
- use
On 25/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had
problems with screen on the other hand...
--
viq
On 26/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had
problems with screen on the other hand...
If you are going to have any luck with
Genadijus Paleckis [2006-10-26, 14:00:53]:
I did not found this module in our ports tree, so here it is
port can be fetched from http://84.32.234.78/ports/p5-Apache-Reload.tar.gz
this does not have a license, so we cannot redistribute it.
Disclaimer:
I will try to contact author of this module about this.
steven mestdagh wrote:
Genadijus Paleckis [2006-10-26, 14:00:53]:
I did not found this module in our ports tree, so here it is
port can be fetched from http://84.32.234.78/ports/p5-Apache-Reload.tar.gz
this does not have a license,
On 10/25/06, Ben Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:05:35AM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote:
screen 4.0.2 is vulnerable and allows for a DoS attack. This updates
screen to version 4.0.3 which is not vulnerable.
ok?
Works fine for me on i386 (3.9-stable and -current).
I
Works under i386, except view button,
since it uses some 'xli' for that, perhaps it can be fixed somehow!
Would suggest adding attached patch patch-bin_gocr_tcl too.
I can't tell that it works really good on real world scanned text. ;]
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:14:37PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot
Tested(i386) xls2csv, catppt on real world files.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:58:59PM +0200, steven mestdagh wrote:
newer version also includes
* xls2csv, which converts excel files to comma separted value format
* catppt, a utility to extract textual information from powerpoint files.
please
Hello,
I was noticing our sites are similar. If you would like to take a look at
my site,
http://www.hhcommunications.com/catalog/Phones-Systems-63-p-1.html, I
think a link from http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html would be beneficial
for both sites.
If you are interested in a link exchange, send
2006/9/25, Eduardo Alvarenga [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/9/25, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Eduardo Alvarenga wrote:
+FLAVORS= transparent snmp ntlm-winbind
I don't think ntlm-winbind is a correct syntax.
Either use ntlm or winbind.
Well, It can be ntlm or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are
not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had
problems with screen on the other hand...
If you are going to have any luck with
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, nikns wrote:
since it uses some 'xli' for that, perhaps it can be fixed somehow!
You have to change Image Viewer in the options.
I set it to nothing by default so you don't get the error and can choose
whatever viewer you prefer.
I also added xsane as a RUN_DEPENDS for
Well right me if I`m wrong but OpenOffice IS in the Ports for OpenBSD 4.0
(i386 only). So shouldn`t I exspect a working port then?!
No, but it's a bit out of the ordinary. In 4.0 the port was in the ports
tree but NOT connected to the build. That is, in 4.0 the
ports/editors/Makefile did
Well right me if I`m wrong but OpenOffice IS in the Ports for OpenBSD
4.0
(i386 only). So shouldn`t I exspect a working port then?!
No, but it's a bit out of the ordinary. In 4.0 the port was in the ports
tree but NOT connected to the build. That is, in 4.0 the
ports/editors/Makefile did
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0.
Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree.
-d
Genadijus Paleckis [Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 07:21:23PM +0300] wrote:
I will try to contact author of this module about this.
Good luck! I tried to reach the author some time ago. No response
unfortunately...
Bernd
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0.
Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree.
-d
Damien, briefly.. you`re talking junk.
What did I do? I tried a Port of
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0.
Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree.
-d
Damien, briefly.. you`re talking junk.
No, Damien is tell the
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:12:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So who`s ignorant here?
You.
It could have been done better...
It was not hooked up to the build for a reason. It does build and work,
I built a package from the port at the time and it did work.
EOF
Shut the hell up. You
Good evening,
I was noticing our sites are similar. If you would like to take a look at
my site,
Actually, no, they are not similar. You would have noticed this if you
had spent some time visiting that site.
But you probably got a list of emails to send your nasty blurb to. I
understand
You are the ignorant asshole, that's clear to everyone.
I wonde rhow people do think about you then... ;]
Why don't you just PLEASE LEAVE and find a project that will listen
to you. NOONE here will ever do anything that you want, because there
is a fundamental LACK OF RESPECT for ANYTHING
Author responded that Apache::Reload is taken over by the mod_perl team
and now it is Apache licensed, I guess it can be commited now ?
modified skeleton can be found
http://84.32.234.78/ports/p5-Apache-Reload.tar.gz
Bernd Ahlers wrote:
Genadijus Paleckis [Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 07:21:23PM
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:33:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| And as I`ve said EOF I`ve ment it.
Hahahahahaha .. Youssa funny ;)
Please please *PLEASE* respond some more to show us how bad you 'ment'
it ;)))
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
(I thought all the fun was back over at misc@ ;)
--
On Thursday 26 October 2006 17:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0.
Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree.
-d
You are such a dumb cunt that I actually feel sorry for you. You and your
retarded opinions are ready for some MirBSD usage. Haven't you figured out yet
that the reason that no one likes you might be because of you?
It is time for you to move on, really. Just fuck off, don't return and have a
On Friday 27 October 2006 05:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damien, briefly.. you`re talking junk.
What did I do? I tried a Port of OpenBSD 4.0 on the only avaiable
architecture. So what are you talking about?
If you love to have it in tree even if it`s brocken the Port itself could
get marked
28 matches
Mail list logo
