On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:15:22AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:03:01AM +0100, Michal Radomski wrote:
> huh? you removed cmake.port.mk. no way that can be right.
>
I've grep for 'cmake' and some ports use devel/cmake in 'MODULES'
variable. Is this connected with that f
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:03:01AM +0100, Michal Radomski wrote:
> I prepare an update to cmake from version 2.4.8 to 2.8.0.
huh? you removed cmake.port.mk. no way that can be right.
did you actually test this with anything in ports? there are at least
15 ports that use cmake. this probably
> I prepare an update to cmake from version 2.4.8 to 2.8.0.
>
> Please test this update for me. On x86 it builds without any problems.
> CMake tends to be platform-independent, so I think, It should work on
> different CPU architectures.
Hi Michal, couple questions on this.
- any reason not to use
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:59:57PM -0400, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Stuart Henderson
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I suggest starting by trying to create a port
> >>
>
> So make install of monetdb/monetdb runs without
> error.
>
> But after the install, when I list th
se não conseguir visualizar correctamente esta newsletter aqui:
http://www.netpromouter.com/link.php?M=145665&N=12&L=6&F=T
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Stuart Henderson
> wrote:
>>
>> I suggest starting by trying to create a port
>>
So make install of monetdb/monetdb runs without
error.
But after the install, when I list the LIB_SHARED
files in /usr/local/lib, there is still no .so libs, only
files with the
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:14:47 -0400 Mark Bucciarelli
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:20 AM, J.C. Roberts
> wrote:
> >
> > The size is not that bad by comparison and dealing with a single
> > file is more reliable dealing with a whole bunch of small files,
> >
>
> I tried building from the lar
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:20 AM, J.C. Roberts wrote:
>
> The size is not that bad by comparison and dealing with a single file is
> more reliable dealing with a whole bunch of small files,
>
I tried building from the large archive, but the directory tree
after make expand didn't match what the po
On 2010/03/18 15:11, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> Further to the Cherokee problem - there is another.
> Below quote snipped from my long history of the missing python.
i'll fix both of these when the tree reopens. thanks :)
Jacob Meuser wrote:
why not install the .mo files? they no longer build them in the
install target, so there's no "can't clean without root privs"
issue any more.
You are right, here is another diff.
Cheers
Giovanni
Index: Makefile
===
11 matches
Mail list logo