Re: UPDATE: www/moinmoin

2013-09-20 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
"Federico G. Schwindt" writes: > Update to 1.9.7. > For details see http://hg.moinmo.in/moin/1.9/file/1.9.7/docs/CHANGES. > While here simplify the Makefile somewhat. > Comments? OK? Basic testing shows no issue so far. ok jca@ Please see below. > f.- > > Index: Makefile > ==

Re: UPDATE: boswars 2.7

2013-09-20 Thread Brad Smith
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:27:01PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > Here is an update to boswars 2.7. > > OK? Added the missing patches directory and its associated files. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/cvs/ports/games/boswars/Mak

Re: UPDATE: boswars 2.7

2013-09-20 Thread Brad Smith
On 17/09/13 1:10 AM, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: Brad Smith writes: Here is an update to boswars 2.7. OK? See how the background is all dark? You need to install the terrain patches directory. This will probably also fix the segfault that happens when exiting boswars from within a match. I do

UPDATE: www/moinmoin

2013-09-20 Thread Federico G. Schwindt
Update to 1.9.7. For details see http://hg.moinmo.in/moin/1.9/file/1.9.7/docs/CHANGES. While here simplify the Makefile somewhat. Comments? OK? f.- Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/www/moinmoin/Makefile,v retrievin

NEW: x11/radeontop (v5)

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
Another one: - add sysutils to CATEGORIES, based on comments from Dmitrij radeontop-0.6.tar.gz Description: application/tar-gz

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v4)

2013-09-20 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On 09/21/13 01:09, Kyle R W Milz wrote: Another one, - Nuked everything generating version.h in Makefile - Include pre generated version.h in the form of a patch that creates a new file (is this OK?) - Changed install permissions of binary from 755 -> 555 after observing the owner write b

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On 09/21/13 01:07, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:46:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: It's probably because of the $(verh) stuff. At least it shouldn't be so, as $(verh) resolves to version.h file which appears to be successfully generated. To my understanding, gmake

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On 09/20/13 23:48, Kyle R W Milz wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:30:21PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:33:27AM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: ports@, Thanks everyone for the feedback, here is an update with changes made. Things I'm wary about still: -

NEW: x11/radeontop (v4)

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
Another one, - Nuked everything generating version.h in Makefile - Include pre generated version.h in the form of a patch that creates a new file (is this OK?) - Changed install permissions of binary from 755 -> 555 after observing the owner write bit is not set usually in sbin/ directory - C

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:46:27PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > It's probably because of the $(verh) stuff. At least it shouldn't be so, as $(verh) resolves to version.h file which appears to be successfully generated. To my understanding, gmake wouldn't exit with 0 status on "gmake all" durin

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:15:07AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > Kyle R W Milz writes: < snip > > Another option is to just set this: > > FAKE_FLAGS = DESTDIR= > > in the port Makefile. Cool thanks. > > Not sure what you're trying to say here but I've removed the DESTDIRNA

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/20 16:45, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:15:07AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: > > < big snip > > > > Is that port supposed to be compiled twice, at build and fake time? > > OK I think I got something here. Untarring reveals that there is no > include/ve

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/20 16:29, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > My knowledge of Make is terrible at best. I think `all' is the default > rule and so it gets invoked during build time, and then at when faking > the install rule is invoked, which depends on `all' again. But I thought > Make was supposed to be smart and

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:15:07AM +0200, J??r??mie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote: < big snip > > Is that port supposed to be compiled twice, at build and fake time? OK I think I got something here. Untarring reveals that there is no include/version.h but there is a getver.sh shell script that is call

Re: Recent version of gcc for amd64?

2013-09-20 Thread Marc Espie
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:01:54PM -0400, John Carr wrote: > Ports worked. I needed OPENBSD_5_4 instead of the 5.3 version I had > checked out. > > Applying the ports patches manually did not work. I needed the ports > build process. Something in the rest of the ports environment is > needed.

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Kyle R W Milz writes: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:30:21PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:33:27AM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: >> > ports@, >> > >> > Thanks everyone for the feedback, here is an update with changes made. >> > >> > Things I'm wary ab

NEW: giflib

2013-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
Quick history: giflib was changed to libungif when the patent became a problem, but more recently this has expired and so development has moved back to giflib. Here's a port for giflib. OK to import it (unlinked for now)? I have a diff for the rest of the tree to switch across (Makefile changes o

Re: Recent version of gcc for amd64?

2013-09-20 Thread John Carr
> > Is it possible to build gcc 4.8 / 4.9 (development) for OpenBSD 5.3 amd64? > > > > I tried and failed. The first stage compiler fails building libgomp > > because of a relocation problem in a DWARF frame descriptor. > > > > "relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object

NEW: x11/radeontop (v3)

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
Here is another spin of this port, with changes requested by Juan: - changed ${PREFIX} -> ${LOCALBASE} in radeontop Makefile - nuked LDFLAGS in radeontop Makefile - removed newline at end of file - removed build dependency on asciidoc as the generated manpage comes with the tarball - tweaked pk

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:30:21PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:33:27AM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > > ports@, > > > > Thanks everyone for the feedback, here is an update with changes made. > > > > Things I'm wary about still: > > > > - had to set DE

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2013-09-20 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Antoine Jacoutot writes: [...] >> > while there, drop run dependency on zoo; clamav actually switched from zoo >> > to unzoo (which we don't have in ports) in 0.60(!) so this was doing >> > nothing. >> > >> >> Here's a barely tested port if archivers/unzoo is wanted. Updated tarball; CPPFLAGS

Re: Recent version of gcc for amd64?

2013-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/20 12:40, John Carr wrote: > > Is it possible to build gcc 4.8 / 4.9 (development) for OpenBSD 5.3 amd64? > > I tried and failed. The first stage compiler fails building libgomp > because of a relocation problem in a DWARF frame descriptor. > > "relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:33:27AM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > ports@, > > Thanks everyone for the feedback, here is an update with changes made. > > Things I'm wary about still: > > - had to set DESTDIRNAME = / to `make package' properly, there's some > sort of weird double path thing going

UPDATE: sdlmame and sdlmess 0.149u1 => 0.150

2013-09-20 Thread Brian Callahan
Hi ports -- After a really short u cycle, mame's version number has been incremented. These 2 patches (one for mame, one for mess) work for me on amd64 - could someone with a fast i386 take these for a spin? ~Brian Index: Makefile ==

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:48:11AM -0700, Ryan Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:33:27AM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > > ports@, > > > > Thanks everyone for the feedback, here is an update with changes made. > > > > Things I'm wary about still: > > > > - had to set DESTDIRNAME = / to `

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2013-09-20 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:45:13PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > Stuart Henderson writes: > > > CVSROOT:/cvs > > Module name:ports > > Changes by: st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2013/09/20 09:23:03 > > > > Modified files: > > security/clamav: Makefile distinfo > > securit

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Ryan Freeman
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 09:33:27AM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > ports@, > > Thanks everyone for the feedback, here is an update with changes made. > > Things I'm wary about still: > > - had to set DESTDIRNAME = / to `make package' properly, there's some > sort of weird double path thing going

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop (v2)

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
ports@, Thanks everyone for the feedback, here is an update with changes made. Things I'm wary about still: - had to set DESTDIRNAME = / to `make package' properly, there's some sort of weird double path thing going on if not - this thing needs root to run, does it make sense to be in bin/ ?

Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

2013-09-20 Thread Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
Stuart Henderson writes: > CVSROOT: /cvs > Module name: ports > Changes by: st...@cvs.openbsd.org 2013/09/20 09:23:03 > > Modified files: > security/clamav: Makefile distinfo > security/clamav/patches: patch-clamd_Makefile_in >patch-database

Recent version of gcc for amd64?

2013-09-20 Thread John Carr
Is it possible to build gcc 4.8 / 4.9 (development) for OpenBSD 5.3 amd64? I tried and failed. The first stage compiler fails building libgomp because of a relocation problem in a DWARF frame descriptor. "relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object" I am not explicitly m

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:56:07PM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:19:34PM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > > ports@, > > > > Attached is an attempt at a port for radeontop, a top like program > > showing GPU utilization on radeon cards >=R600. > > > > It's

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop

2013-09-20 Thread Kyle R W Milz
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:08:32PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2013/09/20 13:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:19:34PM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > > > 1) Getting tarball off of github and the name of the distfile itself > > > (v0.6) > > > > You might want to u

devel/boost: add libboost_locale

2013-09-20 Thread David Coppa
libboost_locale wasn't built because configure didn't pick libiconv right. I'll need it for the upcoming new release of audio/ncmpcpp. oky? Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/boost/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.46 di

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop

2013-09-20 Thread Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:19:34PM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > ports@, > > Attached is an attempt at a port for radeontop, a top like program > showing GPU utilization on radeon cards >=R600. > > It's quite the hack and I'm positive I'm doing some things wrong > including but not limited to >

Fix mariadb with ninja

2013-09-20 Thread David Coppa
Hi! The diff below fixes ninja build of mariadb. There's no need to put sql_builtin.cc into GEN_SOURCES: libmysqld/CMakeLists.txt does the right thing. Tested in subsequent builds with "-j" up to 4. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /

Re: [UPDATE] mail/sylpheed

2013-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/20 07:12, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:33:02 +0200 > Remi Pointel wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > this is the diff to update sylpheed to 3.3.0. > > > > Are you ok? > > > > Cheers, > > > > Remi. > > > 3.4.0 is going to come out soon. I am running 3.4 beta5... > > Please

Re: [UPDATE] mail/sylpheed

2013-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/20 09:33, Remi Pointel wrote: > Hi, > > this is the diff to update sylpheed to 3.3.0. This diff is against an out-of-date tree, you have Makefile 1.98, current is 1.102 > SHARED_LIBS += sylph-0 2.1 # 2.1 > SHARED_LIBS += sylpheed-plugin

Re: [UPDATE] mail/sylpheed

2013-09-20 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:33:02 +0200 Remi Pointel wrote: > Hi, > > this is the diff to update sylpheed to 3.3.0. > > Are you ok? > > Cheers, > > Remi. 3.4.0 is going to come out soon. I am running 3.4 beta5... Please remove the extra PERMIT_* lines. Just keeping the PERMIT_PACKAGE_CDROM= Y

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop

2013-09-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2013/09/20 13:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:19:34PM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > > 1) Getting tarball off of github and the name of the distfile itself > > (v0.6) > > You might want to use DIST_SUBDIR (see bsd.port.mk(5)). BTW, is it really > necessary to hide fil

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop

2013-09-20 Thread Kirill Bychkov
On Fri, September 20, 2013 15:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:19:34PM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: >> 1) Getting tarball off of github and the name of the distfile itself >> (v0.6) > > You might want to use DIST_SUBDIR (see bsd.port.mk(5)). BTW, is it really > necessary t

Re: the_silver_searcher: Patch upstream with 0.16

2013-09-20 Thread Florian Stinglmayr
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:26:38AM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote: > > This appears to need archivers/xz for lzma.h and -llzma support. > Also, a CONFIGURE_ENV line to quash a configure warning. Diff > attached relative to what's in openbsd-wip. > Thank you for the patch I have commited it to openbsd

Re: NEW: x11/radeontop

2013-09-20 Thread Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:19:34PM -0600, Kyle R W Milz wrote: > 1) Getting tarball off of github and the name of the distfile itself > (v0.6) You might want to use DIST_SUBDIR (see bsd.port.mk(5)). BTW, is it really necessary to hide file suffix? > 2) Patching of the Makefile to link to libintl

Re: UPDATE: py-setuptools

2013-09-20 Thread David Coppa
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Remi Pointel wrote: > On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:42:25 +0100 > Edd Barrett wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I noticed that our py-setuptools ports is quite lagging. The following >> diff brings it up to date. >> >> Presumably setuptools is mostly used for building/installing pytho

Re: UPDATE: py-setuptools

2013-09-20 Thread Remi Pointel
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 21:42:25 +0100 Edd Barrett wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that our py-setuptools ports is quite lagging. The following > diff brings it up to date. > > Presumably setuptools is mostly used for building/installing python > packages, so to test I have checked that every port depend

[UPDATE] mail/sylpheed

2013-09-20 Thread Remi Pointel
Hi, this is the diff to update sylpheed to 3.3.0. Are you ok? Cheers, Remi. Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/mail/sylpheed/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.98 diff -u -p -r1.98 Makefile --- Makefile12 Jul 2012 20:17:45

Re: the_silver_searcher: Patch upstream with 0.16

2013-09-20 Thread Brian Callahan
On 09/20/13 03:04, Giovanni Bechis wrote: On 09/19/13 20:34, Florian Stinglmayr wrote: On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:03:52PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: The bash completion script should go in ${PREFIX}/share/bash-completion/completions/ then it will be OK sthen@ for anyone who would like to im

Re: the_silver_searcher: Patch upstream with 0.16

2013-09-20 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 09/19/13 20:34, Florian Stinglmayr wrote: > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:03:52PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> >> The bash completion script should go in >> ${PREFIX}/share/bash-completion/completions/ then it will be OK sthen@ >> for anyone who would like to import. >> > > Fixed. > >> Annoy

Re: sdl: new release soon

2013-09-20 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:16:12AM -0600, Anthony J. Bentley wrote: > Jonathan Gray writes: > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 09:55:00PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > > Even though it still isn't released there are a few projects > > > that now require it so I've added a quick port of the release > > >