On 2015/10/06 18:26, trondd wrote:
> On Tue, October 6, 2015 5:51 am, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > Needs 'update-patches' as well, otherwise looks good to me.
> >
>
> Whoops, missed that. Apparently the patches will still apply even with
> the wrong line numbers.
Thanks - they do apply, but i
On Tue, October 6, 2015 5:51 am, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Needs 'update-patches' as well, otherwise looks good to me.
>
Whoops, missed that. Apparently the patches will still apply even with
the wrong line numbers.
Index: Makefile
==
On 2015/10/05 10:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Any thoughts about doing this? Regression tests are all OK, I'm about
> to start a ports build with it in (but I don't expect any problems).
>
> For bzip2 the call is right at the start of main().
>
> For xz it's a bit lower - below hardware_init(),
Update to the latest version. CHANGES:
0.5.1 (2015-05-27)
=
* Fix META file for versions of OCaml older than 4.02.0 (thanks Anil
Madhavapeddy, closes #20).
0.5.0 (2015-05-18)
=
* Allow to honor server cipher preferences (thanks mfp, closes #18).
* Add functions for reading into/writi
06 окт. 2015 г. 19:24 пользователь "Caspar Schutijser" <
cas...@schutijser.com> написал:
>
> Hi ports@,
>
> below is an update for devel/intellij to 14.1.5. Used it today on amd64,
> works fine for me.
> [...]
> -share/doc/pkg-readmes/${FULLPKGNAME}
> @exec %D/bin/update-desktop-database
> @unexe
Hi ports@,
below is an update for devel/intellij to 14.1.5. Used it today on amd64,
works fine for me.
Best regards,
Caspar Schutijser
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/intellij/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff
Stuart Cassoff writes:
> I believe that TkRat is a good candidate for removal.
> It's old, unmaintained, ugly, no one uses it (most likely)
> and it embeds an old imap library.
As the website says,
> The current stable release of TkRat is 2.1.5. Version 2.2 is nearing
> completion.
> Last modi
I believe that TkRat is a good candidate for removal.
It's old, unmaintained, ugly, no one uses it (most likely)
and it embeds an old imap library.
Stu
On 10/06/15 13:52, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> www/yui lags behind upstream, and it does little more than unzipping
> a tarball. I think it belongs in this category:
>
> "web application with no benefit being packaged", #1
>
> Any objection to remove it?
>
None,
j...@wxcvbn.org (Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas) writes:
> Hi again,
>
> www/yui lags behind upstream, and it does little more than unzipping
> a tarball. I think it belongs in this category:
>
> "web application with no benefit being packaged", #1
>
> Any objection to remove it?
Landry points o
Hi again,
www/yui lags behind upstream, and it does little more than unzipping
a tarball. I think it belongs in this category:
"web application with no benefit being packaged", #1
Any objection to remove it?
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC 0DFA 74AE 1524 E7
Kenneth Westerback writes:
> On 5 October 2015 at 11:51, Josh Elsasser wrote:
[...]
>> I thought I'd jumped in here but it looks like not.
>>
>> This builds and appears to pass tests on macppc, and builds an sbcl
>> which also passes its tests.
>>
>> The fact that the configure script appears
Mikolaj Kucharski writes:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:40:16PM +0200, Jrmie Courr??ges-Anglas wrote:
>> Mikolaj: note that upstream already has AC_C_BIGENDIAN in its
>> configure.ac and already uses it... *except* when the system has an
>> include file. That special case is where the bug was
>>
On 2015/10/05 21:03, trondd wrote:
> Easy update to links+ to 2.12
>
> Adds SSL client certificates, and a warning if SSLv2 or v3 are in use (or
> to disallow them), and a bug fix for cookies.
>
> Running on amd64. I don't have a way to test the new SSL features, though.
Needs 'update-patches'
On 2015/10/06 11:59, Vadim Zhukov wrote:
> 06 окт. 2015 г. 11:24 пользователь "Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas" <
> j...@wxcvbn.org> написал:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > swfdec is unmaintained upstream[1] where the last release dates back to
> > 2008. I doubt that it is of any (safe) use today. Linux distro
06 окт. 2015 г. 11:24 пользователь "Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas" <
j...@wxcvbn.org> написал:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> swfdec is unmaintained upstream[1] where the last release dates back to
> 2008. I doubt that it is of any (safe) use today. Linux distros have
> already removed it.
>
> Any objection to delete
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> swfdec is unmaintained upstream[1] where the last release dates back to
> 2008. I doubt that it is of any (safe) use today. Linux distros have
> already removed it.
>
> Any objection to delete it?
None. Kill it.
Ciao!
Hi,
swfdec is unmaintained upstream[1] where the last release dates back to
2008. I doubt that it is of any (safe) use today. Linux distros have
already removed it.
Any objection to delete it?
[1] http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/wiki/
--
jca | PGP : 0x1524E7EE / 5135 92C1 AD36 5293 2BDF DDCC
18 matches
Mail list logo