Re: update intel microcode to 20220207

2022-02-10 Thread Theo de Raadt
Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > and those experts can stop running fw_update and do it by hand. > > I was testing new firmware package that is not released yet. That's > an expert job. Now I know what to do. The ability to go back-and-forth was part of pkg_add We can't do that with the new firmw

Re: update intel microcode to 20220207

2022-02-10 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 05:21:55PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > We curate a singular choice of each firmware. We supply that. > End of story. I was unaware of the new behavior. > and those experts can stop running fw_update and do it by hand. I was testing new firmware package that is not rele

Re: update intel microcode to 20220207

2022-02-10 Thread Theo de Raadt
Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:40:43PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > Does the new fw_update not check the version number of the file? Does > > it always overwrite with the tgz from firmware.openbsd.org? > > It only checks whether the versions match, one of the caveat

Re: update intel microcode to 20220207

2022-02-10 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 03:51:44PM -0800, Andrew Hewus Fresh wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:40:43PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > > Does the new fw_update not check the version number of the file? Does > > it always overwrite with the tgz from firmware.openbsd.org? > > It only checks wheth

Re: update intel microcode to 20220207

2022-02-10 Thread Andrew Hewus Fresh
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:40:43PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > Does the new fw_update not check the version number of the file? Does > it always overwrite with the tgz from firmware.openbsd.org? It only checks whether the versions match, one of the caveats I explained early in the process was

Re: sparc64 bulk build report

2022-02-10 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:21:16PM -0700, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/sparc64/2022-02-06/textproc/docbook-utils.log > SGML_SEARCH_PATH=../..:../../doc:.. \ > jade -t sgml -i html -d ../../docbook-utils.dsl\#html \ > -V '%use-id-as-filen

UPDATE: lang/node to 16.14.0

2022-02-10 Thread Volker Schlecht
Regular update, no explicitly mentioned security content. PLIST changes are due to the update of the bundled npm to 8.3.1Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/lang/node/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.96 diff -u -p -r1.96 Makefil

Re: sparc64 bulk build report

2022-02-10 Thread Kurt Mosiejczuk
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:06:14PM +, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:21:16PM -0700, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/sparc64/2022-02-06/editors/scintilla.log > /tmp/Editor-6a96be.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/Editor-6a96be.s:45266:

Re: Fwd: [SECURITY] [UPDATE] lang/node to

2022-02-10 Thread Volker Schlecht
I integrated the patch for src/env.cc, dropped one for the bundled uv and upgraded to 12.22.10 ... what do you think? On 2/9/22 20:53, Volker Schlecht wrote: On 2/9/22 14:01, Stuart Henderson wrote: Some software I run doesn't work with 16.x yet, so I have reworked a port for 12 based on the c

Re: sparc64 bulk build report

2022-02-10 Thread Klemens Nanni
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:21:16PM -0700, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote: > http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net/sparc64/2022-02-06/editors/scintilla.log /tmp/Editor-6a96be.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/Editor-6a96be.s:45266: Error: operation combines symbols in different segments [s

Update: databases/postgresql 14.2

2022-02-10 Thread Jeremy Evans
This updates PostgreSQL to the most recent release. Release notes at https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/postgresql-142-136-1210-1115-and-1020-released-2402/ Briefly tested on amd64. OKs? A -stable update to 13.6 will follow after this is committed. Thanks, Jeremy Index: Makefile ==

Re: update intel microcode to 20220207

2022-02-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2022/02/10 01:31, Jonathan Gray wrote: > release notes and list of updated platforms > https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/releases/tag/microcode-20220207 > > tests welcome tested on whiskey lake mobile (06-8e-0c, which was updated), no problem there. OK with m

Re: new net/tdesktop 3.4.8

2022-02-10 Thread Stuart Henderson
Thanks for porting this, it wasn't an easy port and it's much nicer to use than the browser-based one :)

Re: mail/mailman 2.x update

2022-02-10 Thread Okan Demirmen
Just found this still in my tree - bump? ok? Thanks, Okan On Fri 2021.12.24 at 11:09 -0500, Okan Demirmen wrote: > Hi, > > Update to 2.1.39; I've been running everything inbetween and this latest > 2.1.39 on a list server I maintain. > > Covers: CVE-2021-42096, CVE-2021-42097, CVE-2021-43331,

Re: update intel microcode to 20220207

2022-02-10 Thread Jonathan Gray
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:40:43PM +0100, Alexander Bluhm wrote: > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 01:31:11AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > > release notes and list of updated platforms > > https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/releases/tag/microcode-20220207 > > > > tests wel

Re: update intel microcode to 20220207

2022-02-10 Thread Alexander Bluhm
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 01:31:11AM +1100, Jonathan Gray wrote: > release notes and list of updated platforms > https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files/releases/tag/microcode-20220207 > > tests welcome Running on the following machines: with i386 cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R)

databases/timescaledb: update to 2.5.2

2022-02-10 Thread Denis Fondras
This release contains bug fixes since the 2.5.1 release. This release is high priority for upgrade. We strongly recommend that you upgrade as soon as possible. Changelog : https://github.com/timescale/timescaledb/releases/tag/2.5.2 Index: Makefile =