-sparc64 = SIGBUS due to unaligned access when running tests
COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup, fork of ZPAQ
-DIST_TUPLE = github fcorbelli zpaqfranz 59.2 .
+DIST_TUPLE = github fcorbelli zpaqfranz 59.5 .
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz
running tests
COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup, fork of ZPAQ
-DIST_TUPLE = github fcorbelli zpaqfranz 59.2 .
+DIST_TUPLE = github fcorbelli zpaqfranz 59.4 .
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
index f506683a0d2..ce414eb9453 100644
--- a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
+++ b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (fcorbelli-zpaqfranz-59.2.tar.gz) = fWSVSZcsFTpOXww+BMY/vfpz
/zpaqfranz/Makefile
+++ b/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup, fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.11
+GH_TAGNAME = 59.2
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers
for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.10
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.11
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
index 08a49730110..c01bbc163bf 100644
/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.9
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.10
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz
/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.8
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.9
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz
archiver for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.7
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.8
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
index bf0d1db8708..b7f3993b435 100644
--- a/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile
+++ b/archivers/zpaqfranz/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.6
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.7
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
/zpaqfranz/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.5
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.6
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b
for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.4
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.5
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
index 10235b79380..4784cebc527 100644
--- a/archivers
Ha! Indeed. This time, my IT infrastructure had a number of weird problems, so
I had to be creative. I’ll keep in mind that this won’t work. Sorry!
> On Sonntag, Juni 25, 2023 at 10:27 AM, Omar Polo (mailto:o...@omarpolo.com)> wrote:
> On 2023/06/25 01:55:34 +0200, tux0r wrote:
> &
backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.3
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.4
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
index 202f07b74df..10235b79380 100644
--- a/archivers/zpaqfranz
of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.2
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.3
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
index 9c79c1f83eb..202f07b74df 100644
--- a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
(mailto:o...@omarpolo.com)> wrote:
> On 2023/05/02 21:32:52 +0200, tux0r wrote:
> > zpaqfranz 58.2 fixes (among others) the HWSHA2 flag on OpenBSD/amd64.
>
> `zpaqfranz autotest -hw -all' crashes on i386 from SIGILL (illegal
> instruction) in sha256_transform_x86(). Glancing at t
/zpaqfranz/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 58.1
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.2
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ USE_WXNEEDED =Yes
+GH_TAGNAME = 58.1
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
index a2714547118..a286c6ae51a 100644
--- a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
+++ b/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (zpaqfranz-57.5.tar.gz
/zpaqfranz/Makefile
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ COMMENT = journaling archiver for incremental backup,
fork of ZPAQ
GH_ACCOUNT = fcorbelli
GH_PROJECT = zpaqfranz
-GH_TAGNAME = 57.4
+GH_TAGNAME = 57.5
CATEGORIES = archivers
MAINTAINER = tux0r
diff --git a/archivers/zpaqfranz/distinfo b
Ah, I was worried .. it's been days without a new version ... ;-)
Update attached.
zpaqfranz-57.4.diff
Description: Binary data
According to the change log, only proxmox-relevant changes, but we know now
that the developer rarely gives a full overview ... ;-)
Update attached.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-57.3.diff
Description: Binary data
57.2 fixes a few bugs - as always, it is *really* hard to find out what has
changed (the developer still refuses to use a version control system
differently than he would use FTP) -- anyway, update attached...
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-57.2.diff
Description: Binary data
The developer has updated zpaqfranz to 57.1. He seems to test his software on
OpenBSD himself now (or at least he provides static OpenBSD binaries on
GitHub), which is a good thing. :-)
Port update attached.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-57.1.diff
Description: Binary data
A new version has dropped five hours ago. Patch attached.
zpaqfranz-56.4.diff
Description: Binary data
zpaqfranz's developer has made a new version, most changes are Windows-only, so
updating the port was quick and painless.
Patch attached.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-56.2.diff
Description: Binary data
I won’t object. :)
tux0r
> On Freitag, Nov. 18, 2022 at 11:24 AM, Omar Polo (mailto:o...@omarpolo.com)> wrote:
> On 2022/11/18 10:07:06 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2022/11/18 10:27, Omar Polo wrote:
> > > - CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS}" \
> >
Finally, a new major version. Updated port attached.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-56.1.diff
Description: Binary data
A new version is out - diff attached ..
no DNOJIT flavor because of the discussion I linked with the 55.15 diff :)
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-55.16.diff
Description: Binary data
Stuart Henderson schrob am 20.09.2022 um 09:58:
>I wonder if maybe the jit should be disabled by default (possibly adding
>a jit FLAVOR).
There was a discussion about NOJIT on the GitHub project, feat. op@:
https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz/pull/22
tux0r.
Partially. ZPAQ itself is Public Domain, the additions are MIT.
tux0r.
> On Dienstag, Sept. 20, 2022 at 11:00 AM, Stuart Henderson
> mailto:s...@spacehopper.org)> wrote:
> On 2022/09/20 09:58, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > MAINTAINER = tux0r
> > @@ -10,20 +10,17 @@ MAINTA
Ahoi, Peter,
yes, you are right. I copied “-O3 -march=native” from the old Makefile that the
previous port used, but I should probably have taken care of that earlier.
Updated diff attached.
tux0r.
> On Montag, Sept. 19, 2022 at 10:38 PM, Peter Hessler (mailto:phess...@theapt.org)>
For no obvious reason, the dev decided to delete the Makefile, so the port will
have to take care of that as well...
Looks like no OpenBSD-specifics are required this time - here's the patch.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-55.15.diff
Description: Binary data
Diff attached.
As the author added a man page now, but did not include it in the Makefile, I
chose post-install for that to keep maintenance work low. I hope that doesn’t
break a rule…
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-55.14.diff
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Updating zpaqfranz from 55.7 to 55.10.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-55.10.patch
Description: Binary data
Small update for zpaqfranz 55.5 -> 55.7.
In theory, the author has fixed the -DNOJIT build for !amd64 in this version,
but without an !amd64 machine ready, I probably won't add it to the Makefile
again... :)
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-55.7.diff
Description: Binary data
Upstream issue - -DNOJIT shouldn't be used at all:
https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz/pull/22#issuecomment-1180376914=
So, unless this is taken care of, your diff could/should be fine. I cannot test
it though, not having an !amd64 machine at hand currently..
tux0r.
MMENT still
sounds reasonable to me, as it is a (relatively) well-known software and people
might search for it directly.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-55.5.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Update to the port of zpaqfranz-55.3 which I posted a few days ago. As always,
tested only on AMD64 with 7.1.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-55.5.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
Today, zpaqfranz 55.2 was released. I incorporated Omar Polo's patches to my
port in my updated port (attached). :-)
As always, I still plan to maintain the port if you accept it.
tux0r.
zpaqfranz-55.2.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Thank you for your comments. I agree that your patch makes sense. I guess the
upstream PRs will be added in 55.2... generally, looks good to me. :)
tux0r.
I made the port. GitHub repository for the
software itself: https://github.com/fcorbelli/zpaqfranz/
I hope that I made no mistakes. This is my first port (but I plan to maintain
it if you accept it into OpenBSD). :-)
tux0r.
40 matches
Mail list logo
