On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> I presume this is a file which users need to edit? If so, the @sample is
> correct and its OK with me.
Yes, and I retract my statement, I missed the .dist part.
> On 11 February 2016 20:35:03 GMT+00:00, viq wrote:
> >On pon, 2016-02-
I presume this is a file which users need to edit? If so, the @sample is
correct and its OK with me.
On 11 February 2016 20:35:03 GMT+00:00, viq wrote:
>On pon, 2016-02-08 at 10:05 -0600, Kent R. Spillner wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:11:22AM +0100, viq wrote:
>> > Bump
>>
>> Hrrmmm, the
On pon, 2016-02-08 at 10:05 -0600, Kent R. Spillner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:11:22AM +0100, viq wrote:
> > Bump
>
> Hrrmmm, the mail I sent about this last week never made it to the
> list.
> I would prefer to commit this fix.
>
> Ok?
This works for me with two linux clients. Can we g
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 08:11:22AM +0100, viq wrote:
> Bump
Hrrmmm, the mail I sent about this last week never made it to the list.
I would prefer to commit this fix.
Ok?
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /work/cvsroot/ports/productivit
Bump
--
viq
On 6 Feb 2016 10:23 a.m., "viq" wrote:
> Currently productivity/taskd puts a copy of generate.server as vars,
> this installs the proper one.
> --
> viq
>
Currently productivity/taskd puts a copy of generate.server as vars,
this installs the proper one.
--
viq
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /cvs/ports/productivity/taskd/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -u -d -r1.5 Makefile