Re: [NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-12-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/12/06 09:48, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Since this changes the pkgpath, dependencies need a bump to chase it - > you're already bumping the various devel/arm-none-eabi so... > > sqlite> select * from depends where dependspath like 'devel/arm-none-eabi%' >...> and fullpkgpath not like

Re: [NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-12-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/12/06 16:27, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > zhuk@ gave me some of those pointers as well last night. I also added > the @pkgpath, though he said I should explicitly add the trailing comma. The trailing comma looks odd to me, though I don't think it matters either way, we have it both ways in

Re: [NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-12-06 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:48:08AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2016/12/04 22:12, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > If we also add a FLAVOR arm it looks like pkg_add cannot cope with a > > port gaining a flavor without really changing its name. > > It can, but you need to tell it via @pkgpath. It's

Re: [NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-12-06 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2016/12/04 22:12, Patrick Wildt wrote: > If we also add a FLAVOR arm it looks like pkg_add cannot cope with a > port gaining a flavor without really changing its name. It can, but you need to tell it via @pkgpath. It's a little more work but I think it's a more standard way to handle it. You

Re: [NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-12-04 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:57:24PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to import two ports that will allow the cross-build of > > u-boot for 64-bit ARM machines. This is basically a copy of the > >

Re: [NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-11-26 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:57:25PM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to import two ports that will allow the cross-build of > > u-boot for 64-bit ARM machines. This is basically a copy of the > >

Re: [NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-11-25 Thread Patrick Wildt
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to import two ports that will allow the cross-build of > u-boot for 64-bit ARM machines. This is basically a copy of the > devel/arm-none-eabi toolchain with a different --target and without > gdb/newlib (+ one

Re: [NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-11-25 Thread Landry Breuil
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:54:57AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to import two ports that will allow the cross-build of > u-boot for 64-bit ARM machines. This is basically a copy of the > devel/arm-none-eabi toolchain with a different --target and without > gdb/newlib (+ one

[NEW] devel/aarch64-none-elf with binutils and gcc

2016-11-25 Thread Patrick Wildt
Hi, I would like to import two ports that will allow the cross-build of u-boot for 64-bit ARM machines. This is basically a copy of the devel/arm-none-eabi toolchain with a different --target and without gdb/newlib (+ one source code patch in gcc-linaro for aarch64,