Re: devel/py-coverage was [UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-10-05 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:09:56PM -0400, trondd wrote: > On Sat, September 17, 2016 5:00 pm, trondd wrote: > > Daniel Jakots wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:59:01 -0400, "trondd" > >> wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, our py-coverage is lagging a bit. If you want to update it, you > >> should verify

Re: devel/py-coverage was [UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-10-02 Thread Alexandr Shadchin
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:09:56PM -0400, trondd wrote: > On Sat, September 17, 2016 5:00 pm, trondd wrote: > > Daniel Jakots wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:59:01 -0400, "trondd" > >> wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, our py-coverage is lagging a bit. If you want to update it, you > >> should verify

Re: devel/py-coverage was [UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-09-29 Thread trondd
On Sat, September 17, 2016 5:00 pm, trondd wrote: > Daniel Jakots wrote: > >> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:59:01 -0400, "trondd" >> wrote: >> >> Yeah, our py-coverage is lagging a bit. If you want to update it, you >> should verify that ports that depend on it doesn't break. I can have a >> look at it

Re: [UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-09-18 Thread trondd
Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:28:29 -0400, trondd > wrote: > > > - # Move manpages to the right place..darn you setup.py > > - mv ${PREFIX}/share/man/man1/*.1 ${PREFIX}/man/man1/ && \ > > - rm -fr ${PREFIX}/share/man > > Any reason to remove this chunk? It doesn't

devel/py-coverage was [UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-09-17 Thread trondd
Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:59:01 -0400, "trondd" > wrote: > > Yeah, our py-coverage is lagging a bit. If you want to update it, you > should verify that ports that depend on it doesn't break. I can have a > look at it if you don't want to do the work. > > The list: > RUN_D

Re: [UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-09-17 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:59:01 -0400, "trondd" wrote: > The problem here is that I didn't have py-coverage installed. They > require a newer version than we have in ports. I don't know if the > newer one would be backwords compatible or not. Can someone more > experienced with Python ports help

Re: [UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-09-17 Thread trondd
On Sat, September 17, 2016 12:09 pm, Daniel Jakots wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:28:29 -0400, trondd > wrote: > > Any reason to remove this chunk? It doesn't package right now: > $ make package > `/usr/ports/pobj/gpodder-3.9.1/fake-amd64/.fake_done' is up to date. > ===> Building package for gp

Re: [UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-09-17 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:28:29 -0400, trondd wrote: > - # Move manpages to the right place..darn you setup.py > - mv ${PREFIX}/share/man/man1/*.1 ${PREFIX}/man/man1/ && \ > - rm -fr ${PREFIX}/share/man Any reason to remove this chunk? It doesn't package right now: $ make packag

[UPDATE] net/gpodder 3.1.0 to 3.9.1

2016-09-17 Thread trondd
Here's a patch to update gPodder to 3.9.1. Moved the download to GitHub, clean up build and install targets, use their environment variable to get the man pages in the right place, and take maintainer. This it my first time messing with GH_*, and Python. Feedback encouraged. Tests pass, portchec