On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:30:20AM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>
> On 2/20/24 11:04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2024/02/20 10:37, Renaud Allard wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/20/24 10:19, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > > On 2024/02/20 09:30, Renaud Allard wrote:
> > > > > Yes, the name
On 2/20/24 11:04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2024/02/20 10:37, Renaud Allard wrote:
On 2/20/24 10:19, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2024/02/20 09:30, Renaud Allard wrote:
Yes, the name doesn't tell anything by itself.
Is this one better? The binary is still called q, but the package is dnsq.
On 2024/02/20 10:37, Renaud Allard wrote:
>
>
> On 2/20/24 10:19, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2024/02/20 09:30, Renaud Allard wrote:
> > > Yes, the name doesn't tell anything by itself.
> > > Is this one better? The binary is still called q, but the package is dnsq.
> >
> > If naming the
On 2/20/24 10:19, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2024/02/20 09:30, Renaud Allard wrote:
Yes, the name doesn't tell anything by itself.
Is this one better? The binary is still called q, but the package is dnsq.
If naming the package dnsq, I'd suggest also adding a symlink, dnsq -> q.
I have
On 2024/02/20 09:30, Renaud Allard wrote:
> Yes, the name doesn't tell anything by itself.
> Is this one better? The binary is still called q, but the package is dnsq.
If naming the package dnsq, I'd suggest also adding a symlink, dnsq -> q.
On 2/20/24 09:17, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:09:49AM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
On 2/19/24 16:50, Renaud Allard wrote:
Hello,
Here is a preliminary port for "q" which is a tiny and feature-rich
command line DNS client with support for UDP, TCP, DoT, DoH, DoQ, and