Re: [new] x11/fbpanel 4.11

2007-07-18 Thread Landry Breuil
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:43:17PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Landry Breuil wrote: - --prefix=${LOCALBASE} looks wrong Changed to /usr/local Huh? No, it should be --prefix=${PREFIX} Okay, now i understand (thanks kili for the explanations) ps: i still think my

Re: [new] x11/fbpanel 4.11

2007-07-16 Thread Landry Breuil
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 06:41:53PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Landry Breuil wrote: Port available here : http://ports.gcu.info/doku.php/openbsd/x11/fbpanel - --prefix=${LOCALBASE} looks wrong Changed to /usr/local - COMMENT doesn't need quotes nor final dot Ok,

Re: [new] x11/fbpanel 4.11

2007-07-16 Thread Matthias Kilian
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 11:06:12PM +0200, Landry Breuil wrote: - --prefix=${LOCALBASE} looks wrong Changed to /usr/local I didn't look at the port itself, but just to clarify this a little bit: LOCALBASE is where dependencies actually reside, so it's typically used for -I and -L argsuments,

Re: [new] x11/fbpanel 4.11

2007-07-16 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Landry Breuil wrote: - --prefix=${LOCALBASE} looks wrong Changed to /usr/local Huh? No, it should be --prefix=${PREFIX} - fake target fails when USE_SYSTRACE is set Weird, works here with systrace enabled on three various -current. Yeah, must be a local fuck up.

[new] x11/fbpanel 4.11

2007-07-15 Thread Landry Breuil
Hello porters, this is an updated-reworked version of a port posted two years ago by Kyle Amon (http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-portsm=112679456625739w=2), which apparently didn't go in tree. Port available here : http://ports.gcu.info/doku.php/openbsd/x11/fbpanel from

Re: [new] x11/fbpanel 4.11

2007-07-15 Thread Benoit Chesneau
On 7/15/07, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - fake target fails when USE_SYSTRACE is set with USE_SYSTRACE, fake target is ok on my box. marduk% sysctl kern.version kern.version=OpenBSD 4.1-current (GENERIC) #4: Sat Jul 7 17:01:27 CEST 2007 [EMAIL