On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 20:11:52 +
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2021/11/07 12:14, Kurt Miller wrote:
> > Yes adding -L/usr/X11R6/lib allows them to link, but the question is
> > why is it necessary when the libs ld claims it can’t find are explicitly
> > listed in the list of libs with full
On 2021/11/07 12:14, Kurt Miller wrote:
> Yes adding -L/usr/X11R6/lib allows them to link, but the question is
> why is it necessary when the libs ld claims it can’t find are explicitly
> listed in the list of libs with full paths to find them?
I'm not sure of the reason, but there are a number
Ok. And thanks for looking at it.
Can you please add a small comment that it’s only needed for non llvm arches.
Cheers!
—
Antoine
> On 7 Nov 2021, at 18:33, Kurt Miller wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2021, at 12:14 PM, Kurt Miller wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 7, 2021, at 11:05 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Nov 7, 2021, at 12:14 PM, Kurt Miller wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2021, at 11:05 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:51:53AM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
>>> On Nov 5, 2021, at 3:34 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Kurt
On Nov 7, 2021, at 11:05 AM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:51:53AM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
>> On Nov 5, 2021, at 3:34 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:59:35PM +0100,
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 10:51:53AM -0500, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2021, at 3:34 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:59:35PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at
On Nov 5, 2021, at 3:34 PM, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:59:35PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:43:50PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
The switch to building with
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:59:35PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:43:50PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > > The switch to building with meson for the update to 1.17.4 did not get
> > > along with
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 07:59:35PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:43:50PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> > The switch to building with meson for the update to 1.17.4 did not get
> > along with sparc64 at all. Which knocks out a large portion of the tree.
> >
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:43:50PM -0400, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> The switch to building with meson for the update to 1.17.4 did not get
> along with sparc64 at all. Which knocks out a large portion of the tree.
>
> Switching back to using autotools (and updating the PLIST) fixes the build
> on
The switch to building with meson for the update to 1.17.4 did not get
along with sparc64 at all. Which knocks out a large portion of the tree.
Switching back to using autotools (and updating the PLIST) fixes the build
on sparc64 (and doesn't break it on amd64).
ok?
(cc maintainer)
--Kurt
11 matches
Mail list logo