Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-16 Thread Uwe Werler
On 16 Mar 08:20, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Yes, please try to get a backtrace. > > -- > Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. > > On 16 March 2020 07:00:06 Uwe Werler wrote: > > > Hi Stuart, > > > > thanks for the advice! > > > > The output is as follows: > > > >

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
Yes, please try to get a backtrace. -- Sent from a phone, apologies for poor formatting. On 16 March 2020 07:00:06 Uwe Werler wrote: On 15 Mar 17:34, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2020/03/15 17:27, Uwe Werler wrote: > > ### > > > gdb /usr/local/sbin/redis-server

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-16 Thread Uwe Werler
On 15 Mar 17:34, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2020/03/15 17:27, Uwe Werler wrote: > > > > ### > > > > > > gdb /usr/local/sbin/redis-server /tmp/redis-server.core > > GNU gdb 6.3 > > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020/03/15 17:27, Uwe Werler wrote: > > ### > > > gdb /usr/local/sbin/redis-server /tmp/redis-server.core > GNU gdb 6.3 > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > welcome to change it and/or

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-15 Thread Uwe Werler
On 15 Mar 06:40, Theo Buehler wrote: > > Hi Theo, > > > > just "back ported" redis to 6.6 and it works like a charm on amd64 (except > > sentinel which segfaults - but it did also on 4.0.14). > > > > Thanks. Yes, there should be no major problems backporting this. > > Could you share a

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-14 Thread Theo Buehler
> Hi Theo, > > just "back ported" redis to 6.6 and it works like a charm on amd64 (except > sentinel which segfaults - but it did also on 4.0.14). > Thanks. Yes, there should be no major problems backporting this. Could you share a reproducer for this sentinel segfault so I can look into it?

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-14 Thread Uwe Werler
On 12 Mar 22:19, Theo Buehler wrote: > Released earlier today. According to the changelog [1]: > > Upgrade urgency HIGH: This release fixes security issues. > > HIGH means that there is a critical bug that affects a subset of users. > I'm unsure which one of the listed bugs that is, though. > >

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-13 Thread Daniel Jakots
On Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:53:12 +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > Opinions? I vote for "move forward" :) Cheers, Daniel

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-13 Thread Theo Buehler
> Built and regress tests run successfully on amd64, macppc and sparc64. > Some further light testing on amd64 with some toy databases. I have run the regression tests a few more times and it looks like I got lucky when running the tests on sparc64 the first two times. Running them results in one

Re: [update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-12 Thread Klemens Nanni
OK kn

[update] redis 5.0.8

2020-03-12 Thread Theo Buehler
Released earlier today. According to the changelog [1]: Upgrade urgency HIGH: This release fixes security issues. HIGH means that there is a critical bug that affects a subset of users. I'm unsure which one of the listed bugs that is, though. The source diff to 5.0.7 is relatively small and