On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 01:37:46PM +0100, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28 2021, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > Is it time to consider changing the gcc default to gnu99?
> Definitely. I have considered this since some time already and feel
> a bit lame for not even proposing it. I
On Tue, Dec 28 2021, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 09:50:04PM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
>> I find myself adding the following to many ports files nowadays
>>
>> .include
>> .if !${PROPERTIES:Mclang}
>> CFLAGS +=-std=gnu99
>> .endif
>>
>> Rather than continue this, I'd
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 09:50:04PM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> I find myself adding the following to many ports files nowadays
>
> .include
> .if !${PROPERTIES:Mclang}
> CFLAGS += -std=gnu99
> .endif
>
> Rather than continue this, I'd like to propose adding BASE_C99 to bsd.port.mk
>
>
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 09:50:04PM -0500, Kurt Mosiejczuk wrote:
> I find myself adding the following to many ports files nowadays
>
> .include
> .if !${PROPERTIES:Mclang}
> CFLAGS += -std=gnu99
> .endif
>
> Rather than continue this, I'd like to propose adding BASE_C99 to bsd.port.mk
>
>
I find myself adding the following to many ports files nowadays
.include
.if !${PROPERTIES:Mclang}
CFLAGS += -std=gnu99
.endif
Rather than continue this, I'd like to propose adding BASE_C99 to bsd.port.mk
When BASE_C99= Yes, if on a non-base-clang arch, it will add the same to
CFLAGS,
