Re: Backport links+-2.0.14 to -stable (was: Re: [UPDATE] www/links+ to 2.14)

2016-12-01 Thread trondd
On Thu, December 1, 2016 5:07 am, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes: > >> Should this be backported to -stable? > > It appears so, as discussed with Tim. Could someone give this a shot > on -stable? Please include the output of > ''make

Re: Backport links+-2.0.14 to -stable (was: Re: [UPDATE] www/links+ to 2.14)

2016-12-01 Thread trondd
On Thu, December 1, 2016 5:07 am, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes: > >> trondd writes: >> >>> Update links+ to 2.14 >>> >>> Fixes some security related issues: >>> >>> * Limit keepalive of ciphers with 64-bit block size

Backport links+-2.0.14 to -stable (was: Re: [UPDATE] www/links+ to 2.14)

2016-12-01 Thread Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
Jeremie Courreges-Anglas writes: > trondd writes: > >> Update links+ to 2.14 >> >> Fixes some security related issues: >> >> * Limit keepalive of ciphers with 64-bit block size to mitigate >> the SWEET32 attack >> * Improved tor hardening - when the user