On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 19:07:07 +
> On March 13, 2024 7:24:26 PM GMT+01:00, Stuart Henderson via ports
>
> I think something like this would be preferable
>
> # requires C++20
> COMPILER = base-clang
>
I attached the diffs with this change
> > On 2024/03/13 19:36, Tobias Heider via ports
On 2024/03/13 19:36, Tobias Heider via ports wrote:
>
>
> On March 13, 2024 7:24:26 PM GMT+01:00, Stuart Henderson via ports
> wrote:
> >On 2024/03/13 12:31, izder456 via ports wrote:
> >> Hey ports@-
> >>
> >> Looks like these ports I take MAINTAINER on fail on sparc64 with the
> >> same
On March 13, 2024 7:24:26 PM GMT+01:00, Stuart Henderson via ports
wrote:
>On 2024/03/13 12:31, izder456 via ports wrote:
>> Hey ports@-
>>
>> Looks like these ports I take MAINTAINER on fail on sparc64 with the
>> same u8string error, which AFAIK is a C++20 thing.
>>
>> From what it looks
On 2024/03/13 12:31, izder456 via ports wrote:
> Hey ports@-
>
> Looks like these ports I take MAINTAINER on fail on sparc64 with the
> same u8string error, which AFAIK is a C++20 thing.
>
> From what it looks like, sparc64 doesn't have a C++20 compiler, so they
> unfortunately will be broken on
Hey ports@-
Looks like these ports I take MAINTAINER on fail on sparc64 with the
same u8string error, which AFAIK is a C++20 thing.
From what it looks like, sparc64 doesn't have a C++20 compiler, so they
unfortunately will be broken on that arch.
Attached are diffs that adds BROKEN-sparc64 to
