I generally work fast and careful, and the docs are lacking on how to
find dependencies (unless I am missing it). As noted previously though
there are a large number of things outdated, so of course submissions
will be in batches, not sure how you expect this worked around. If there
is a module
On 2018/11/20 17:11, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Stuart,
>
> I did some thinking on this as a heavy consumer, and light developer, of
> Python applications.
>
> There are 455 Python3 modules currently in the repository would would be
> unreasonable to test all of them [1].
Yes it would be unrea
Stuart,
I did some thinking on this as a heavy consumer, and light developer, of
Python applications.
There are 455 Python3 modules currently in the repository would would be
unreasonable to test all of them [1]. That being said there also appears
to be hesitation on importing updated module
I am in agreement with the replacement. The symlink was a suggestion if for
some reason people want to have both available.
On Thursday, November 15, 2018, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2018/11/15 09:58, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
>> Daniel your update builds and runs fine for me on amd64.
>>
>> T
On 2018/11/15 09:58, Edward Lopez-Acosta wrote:
> Daniel your update builds and runs fine for me on amd64.
>
> Two notes though:
>
> Current version is now 3.7.1, I tested and same patches apply to this
> version.
>
> Second is if we have side by side installs then /usr/local/bin/python3
> shoul
Daniel your update builds and runs fine for me on amd64.
Two notes though:
Current version is now 3.7.1, I tested and same patches apply to this
version.
Second is if we have side by side installs then /usr/local/bin/python3
should be a symlink to the users preferred version. Not owned by a pack
On Thu Sep 27, 2018 at 07:35:50AM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:21:01 -0400, Daniel Jakots
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:19:13 -0400, Daniel Jakots
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:28:06 -0400, Daniel Jakots
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Does the test s
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 20:21:01 -0400, Daniel Jakots
wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:19:13 -0400, Daniel Jakots
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:28:06 -0400, Daniel Jakots
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Does the test suite work for you? In my case it seems it never
> > > ends with "running: test_asy
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:19:13 -0400, Daniel Jakots
wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:28:06 -0400, Daniel Jakots
> wrote:
>
> > Does the test suite work for you? In my case it seems it never ends
> > with "running: test_asyncio (2 min 52 sec)" until I ^c. If people
> > have the same, I'll add TEST_I
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 22:19:13 -0400, Daniel Jakots
wrote:
> New tgz attached because the plist needed some @comment.
ping
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 14:28:06 -0400, Daniel Jakots
wrote:
> Does the test suite work for you? In my case it seems it never ends
> with "running: test_asyncio (2 min 52 sec)" until I ^c. If people
> have the same, I'll add TEST_IS_INTERACTIVE=Yes
I looked into it and didn't find any solution. It ha
On Sat, Sep 08, 2018 at 02:28:06PM -0400, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'd like to have python 3.7 for 6.4 (not as the default version of
> course) and somewhere during 6.4 cycle we could switch over to it for
> our python ports.
>
> I took 3.6 and adapted it for the new version.
>
> Does the
Hey,
I'd like to have python 3.7 for 6.4 (not as the default version of
course) and somewhere during 6.4 cycle we could switch over to it for
our python ports.
I took 3.6 and adapted it for the new version.
Does the test suite work for you? In my case it seems it never ends with
"running: test_a
13 matches
Mail list logo