Hi sthen,
> Slightly tweaked version attached, this one's ok with me:
>
> - https homepage
> - PERMIT_*_CDROM is not used for new ports
> - whitespace nit in Makefile
> - tweak comment in patch
> - place @extraunexec above the @sample line, that way pkg_delete -c doesn't
> complain about a
On 2019/05/23 20:09, Jan Vlach wrote:
> Hi Gleydson, Stuart, ports,
>
> I'm running tac_plus with 200+ boxes with IOS, IOS-XE and IOS-XR.
>
> please see attached tgz for updated port.
>
> - I've taken Gleydson's latest work from openbsd-wip (I don't see the
> unexec and/or doc/shared
Hi,
tac_plus compiles and runs fine on octeon too. (Edge Router Lite,
-current)
Tested slightly with py_tacacs_plus.
Encrypted and cleartext logins work, and authentication both to syslog
and dedicated file.
jvl
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 01:49:29PM +0200, Ampie Niemand wrote:
> This does the
This does the trick and installs perfectly on macppc, will test i386
and amd64 when I get home.
My thoughts are that because all the TACACS+ ports were obsolete after
6.2, the _tacacs user was sort of "deauthorized" in the infrastructure
userlist.
Reading the error message properly this time it
Try with the change below and Let us know if it works for you,
Thank you
sent from my mobile device
On Fri, May 24, 2019, at 7:43 AM, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> it requires _tacacs user due to privdrop, so you need to uncomment the
> folllwing line:
> {x250} /usr/ports $ grep -rn tacacs
it requires _tacacs user due to privdrop, so you need to uncomment the
folllwing line:
{x250} /usr/ports $ grep -rn tacacs /usr/ports/infrastructure/*
/usr/ports/infrastructure/db/user.list:22:#511 _tacacs _tacacs
net/tacacs+
i'm with limited internet access till tomorrow
Hi, all.
Thanks for reviving this awesome service.
I'm failing at the last hurdle with both macppc and amd64:
..
..
===> Building package for tacacs+-4.0.4.28v0
Create /usr/ports/packages/powerpc/all/tacacs+-4.0.4.28v0.tgz
Creating package tacacs+-4.0.4.28v0
Error: newgroup _tacacs:
> > Also should be nice sent patches upstream. Jan Vlach, what do you think
> > about?
>
> not sure there's an upstream at all:
fwiw, there is some faint activity at tac_p...@shrubbery.net, with
mostly John Heasley helping poor souls. Patches should be welcomed
here I guess.
many thanks for
Gleydson,
> Done.
> Thanks for the feedback, i'm pushing it to openbsd-wip.
is this the correct openbsd-wip?
https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip
I don't see the changes sthen@ pointed out there ...
> PS.: I'm running it and works just fine It has a dozen of Cisco Nexus
> switches
Hi Gleydson, Stuart, ports,
I'm running tac_plus with 200+ boxes with IOS, IOS-XE and IOS-XR.
please see attached tgz for updated port.
- I've taken Gleydson's latest work from openbsd-wip (I don't see the
unexec and/or doc/shared implemented in PLIST) *
- provided simplified
> Can you use the standard locations for doc/examples please rather
> than /usr/local/share/tacacs?
Yep.
> Needs @extraunexec rm -f /var/log/tac_plus/* for pkg_delete -c.
Done.
Thanks for the feedback, i'm pushing it to openbsd-wip.
PS.: I'm running it and works just fine It has a dozen of
On 2019/05/20 16:55, Gleydson Soares wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> thank you for your effort on this port.
> i've pushed it to openbsd-wip at
> https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/net/tacacs%2B
> it addresses the joint work of you and sthen@
>
> are you still ok regarding of taking
Hi Gleydson,
thank you for getting in touch! I'm running it in production, so yes,
taking maintainer is ok.
I haven't tried to rebuild with 6.5 yet, that's on my TODO list though.
Could do that in next few days for both 6.5 and -current.
Thank you,
Jan
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:55:33PM
Hi Jan,
thank you for your effort on this port.
i've pushed it to openbsd-wip at
https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/net/tacacs%2B
it addresses the joint work of you and sthen@
are you still ok regarding of taking maintanership?
i will give some extra tests and double review
Hello Stuart,
thank you for fixing and feedback on the tacacs+ port. I've learned a lot here.
Sorry for late response, I was missing some commmands in accounting log
and command denies were not enforced properly and I needed to find out
why. I was missing part of config on the catalyst side, so
On 2018/10/25 11:33, Jan Vlach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is NEW port of tacacs+ based on the version from people at
> shrubbery.net (as hinted in net/tacacs+ in attic)
>
> * I've patched out tac_pwd, so it is not being built. It just
> segfaults, can generate md5 and des passwords. encrypt(1)
Hi,
this is NEW port of tacacs+ based on the version from people at
shrubbery.net (as hinted in net/tacacs+ in attic)
* I've patched out tac_pwd, so it is not being built. It just
segfaults, can generate md5 and des passwords. encrypt(1) is better
choice to get supported hash.
*
17 matches
Mail list logo
