On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:43:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I think this one is post-release.
So, definitely post-release. You'll also need to bump all gpgme
consumers, since they all fail to package because the dependency
changes:
-@depend security/gpgme:gpgme-*:gpgme-1.9.0p0
+@depend
I think this one is post-release.
On 2018/03/18 10:07, Landry Breuil wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 08:13:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > On Sun Feb 25, 2018 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Please find below a new diff which includes a (q)gpgme as FLAVOR.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 08:13:03PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun Feb 25, 2018 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > >
> > > Please find below a new diff which includes a (q)gpgme as FLAVOR. All
> > > consumers build and package fine on amd64.
> > >
> > > I got positive
On Sun Feb 25, 2018 at 05:56:50PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Please find below a new diff which includes a (q)gpgme as FLAVOR. All
> > consumers build and package fine on amd64.
> >
> > I got positive feedback from Caspar Schutijser (trojita mainatiner).
> >
> > Ok?
>
>
> Updated
On Wed Feb 21, 2018 at 04:37:02PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2018/02/16 07:33, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live
> > > security/qgpgme.
> > >
On Fri Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/02/16 07:33, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live
> > security/qgpgme.
> >
> > Since Sep. 2016[1] the C++ bindings for GnuPG's GPGME library and
> >
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > 2.) trojita_qgpgme.diff
> > Patch trojita to play with qgpgme from GPGME based on the idea from
> > archlinux[3]. Tested on amd64. All tests are green.
>
> Is there any chance of upstream adopting these patches? (not a show
>
On 2018/02/17 13:03, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > I'd be happier with this being part of a single gpgme port if the
> > compiler settings thing can be fixed as above. Apart from anything
> > else these fixed-version dependencies make
On Fri Feb 16, 2018 at 11:57:44AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018/02/16 07:33, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live
> > security/qgpgme.
> >
> > Since Sep. 2016[1] the C++ bindings for GnuPG's GPGME library and
> >
On 2018/02/16 07:33, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live
> security/qgpgme.
>
> Since Sep. 2016[1] the C++ bindings for GnuPG's GPGME library and
> the Qt Job API for GpgME++ (QGpgME) is part of the GPGME repository.
>
> It wasn't
Hi All,
tl;dr: x11/kde-applications/gpgmepp is dead upstream. Long live
security/qgpgme.
Since Sep. 2016[1] the C++ bindings for GnuPG's GPGME library and
the Qt Job API for GpgME++ (QGpgME) is part of the GPGME repository.
It wasn't a good idea to make an FLAVOR in security/gpgme; discussed
11 matches
Mail list logo
