OK, I'm not a lawyer, but the following snippet
of code from visitors' source makes it sound
like it is re-licensing BSD code. The part that
reads: Originally under the BSD license.
Is this right? Or am I misreading something? I
thought only the copyright owner may change the
terms of the
yeah.. here's the tarball :-D
--
Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
visitors.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:33:07 +0900
Mathieu Sauve-Frankel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah.. here's the tarball :-D
--
Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
Cool toy but I had segmentation faults on 3.9 i386. After correcting the booboo
all is fine.
/tmp $ diff -ur www/visitors/ /usr/ports/www/visitors/
Cool toy but I had segmentation faults on 3.9 i386. After correcting the
booboo all is fine.
here's a revised port. without the graphviz dependency and the old patch.
--
Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
visitors.tgz
Description: application/tar-gz
