Re: Opinions - Multiple versions of lang/erlang needed?

2023-01-15 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 02:02:56PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Sat Jan 14, 2023 at 11:33:00AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2023/01/14 10:52, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > > I never tried to submit a patch for dropping something, but > > > here's an honest attempt - of course

Re: Opinions - Multiple versions of lang/erlang needed?

2023-01-14 Thread Rafael Sadowski
On Sat Jan 14, 2023 at 11:33:00AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023/01/14 10:52, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > I never tried to submit a patch for dropping something, but > > here's an honest attempt - of course devel/rebar needs to be > > dropped as well, since it depends on erlang21. > > >

Re: Opinions - Multiple versions of lang/erlang needed?

2023-01-14 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2023/01/14 11:33, Stuart Henderson wrote: > Looks good to me, we will also need quirks/@pkgpath markers to handle > updates from 21 to 25 but whoever commits can do that. And rebar->rebar3 I think

Re: Opinions - Multiple versions of lang/erlang needed?

2023-01-13 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
I would love to remove erlang 21. It’s in the way of the wxWidgets update. — Antoine > On 13 Jan 2023, at 20:08, Volker Schlecht wrote: > > Hi, > > with database/riak not in ports anymore, we don't have a present need to keep > erlang/21 and, for that matter, devel/rebar around any longer.

Opinions - Multiple versions of lang/erlang needed?

2023-01-13 Thread Volker Schlecht
Hi, with database/riak not in ports anymore, we don't have a present need to keep erlang/21 and, for that matter, devel/rebar around any longer. What's the general opinion about keeping the infrastructure for multiple versions of erlang around? Is that generally still desirable or has it