On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 02:02:56PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Sat Jan 14, 2023 at 11:33:00AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2023/01/14 10:52, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > > I never tried to submit a patch for dropping something, but
> > > here's an honest attempt - of course
On Sat Jan 14, 2023 at 11:33:00AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023/01/14 10:52, Volker Schlecht wrote:
> > I never tried to submit a patch for dropping something, but
> > here's an honest attempt - of course devel/rebar needs to be
> > dropped as well, since it depends on erlang21.
> >
>
On 2023/01/14 11:33, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Looks good to me, we will also need quirks/@pkgpath markers to handle
> updates from 21 to 25 but whoever commits can do that.
And rebar->rebar3 I think
I would love to remove erlang 21. It’s in the way of the wxWidgets update.
—
Antoine
> On 13 Jan 2023, at 20:08, Volker Schlecht wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> with database/riak not in ports anymore, we don't have a present need to keep
> erlang/21 and, for that matter, devel/rebar around any longer.
Hi,
with database/riak not in ports anymore, we don't have a present need to
keep erlang/21 and, for that matter, devel/rebar around any longer.
What's the general opinion about keeping the infrastructure for multiple
versions of erlang around? Is that generally still desirable or has it