Re: PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-27 Thread Peter Valchev
On 1/25/08, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Antti Harri wrote: If you don't specify a major.minor in the name passed dlopen() it will select the one with the highest major then highest minor after that. Anyone wanting to commit this has my OK; it really

Re: PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-25 Thread Peter Strömberg
On 25 Jan 2008 at 0:27, Brad wrote: On Friday 25 January 2008 00:21:38 Antti Harri wrote: Anyone? ok brad@ Though something really needs to be done about fixing this properly. IMO this is ridiculous to have a hardcoded shared library name in the resulting binary. Eh, why not just

Re: PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-25 Thread Antti Harri
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Peter Strömberg wrote: Eh, why not just use libGL.so so it will find any available version? I thought about this too. But what version will it use when there are multiple version installed? For example libGL.so.5.1 and libGL.so.6.0. Like we do in firefox:

Re: PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-25 Thread Antti Harri
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Kurt Miller wrote: I thought about this too. But what version will it use when there are multiple version installed? For example libGL.so.5.1 and libGL.so.6.0. If you don't specify a major.minor in the name passed dlopen() it will select the one with the highest major

Re: PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-25 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Antti Harri wrote: If you don't specify a major.minor in the name passed dlopen() it will select the one with the highest major then highest minor after that. Anyone wanting to commit this has my OK; it really fixes things... Index: Makefile

Re: PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-25 Thread Kurt Miller
On Friday 25 January 2008 5:17:28 am Antti Harri wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Peter Strömberg wrote: Eh, why not just use libGL.so so it will find any available version? I thought about this too. But what version will it use when there are multiple version installed? For example libGL.so.5.1

Re: PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-24 Thread Antti Harri
Anyone? On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Antti Harri wrote: Hi, I found out the reason why some SDL apps were segfaulting. http://users.openbsd.fi/iku/files/sdl.diff ? w-sdl-1.2.13 Index: Makefile === RCS file:

Re: PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-24 Thread Brad
On Friday 25 January 2008 00:21:38 Antti Harri wrote: Anyone? ok brad@ Though something really needs to be done about fixing this properly. IMO this is ridiculous to have a hardcoded shared library name in the resulting binary. On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Antti Harri wrote: Hi, I found out

PATCH: devel/sdl

2008-01-18 Thread Antti Harri
Hi, I found out the reason why some SDL apps were segfaulting. http://users.openbsd.fi/iku/files/sdl.diff ? w-sdl-1.2.13 Index: Makefile === RCS file: /cvs/ports/devel/sdl/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.60 diff -u -r1.60