While the facts you state are correct, the suggestion that the
Courier-IMAP in tree is vulnerable is not. The vulnerabilities you state
are either fixed in 3.0.5 or not relevant; see the Changelog at
http:/www.courier-mta.org/imap.
Indeed, I took a closer look at those vulnerabilities and
I am looking at setting up a mail solution for my home usage, and
those seem to be a popular option from what people on the net seem to
say. But, when looking at what we have in ports I noticed the versions
are over 2 years old... So here's my question - did anyone have, or is
aware of, any
* viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-22 14:53]:
I am looking at setting up a mail solution for my home usage, and
those seem to be a popular option from what people on the net seem to
say. But, when looking at what we have in ports I noticed the versions
are over 2 years old... So here's my
On 9/22/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-22 14:53]:
I am looking at setting up a mail solution for my home usage, and
those seem to be a popular option from what people on the net seem to
say. But, when looking at what we have in ports I noticed the
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:57:45PM +0200, viq wrote:
On 9/22/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-22 14:53]:
I am looking at setting up a mail solution for my home usage, and
those seem to be a popular option from what people on the net seem to
say.
On 9/22/06, Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 03:57:45PM +0200, viq wrote:
On 9/22/06, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-22 14:53]:
I am looking at setting up a mail solution for my home usage, and
those seem to be a
