Patrick Wildt:
> sthen, naddy: OK to put it in, or too late?
ok
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
i386 builds as well, as expected!
> Move aarch64 to the front of the list.
Sure, will do that.
sthen, naddy: OK to put it in, or too late?
Am Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 01:18:05AM +0200 schrieb Patrick Wildt:
> Cool, thanks, Robert.
>
> > sthen | makes sense to have that mono diff, need to be sure
On 4/9/2021 11:15 AM, Patrick Wildt wrote:
Hi,
to do some release tests with iked we wanted to play^Wtest games/openra
over IPsec. Turns out that arm64 does not support lang/mono, but I have
gotten it to run. With the following diff, games/openra builds and I
can even play it.
This doesn't
Cool, thanks, Robert.
> sthen | makes sense to have that mono diff, need to be sure it doesn't break
> existing working archs (looked good from a quick read but i haven't tested)
The changes are all encapsulated in proper arch ifdefs. To verify that
is the case I'll compile it on our two mono
Hi
I am okay with this and i do not see why it cannot make release.
On 09/04/21 17:15 +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to do some release tests with iked we wanted to play^Wtest games/openra
> over IPsec. Turns out that arm64 does not support lang/mono, but I have
> gotten it to run.
