I think we now have the critical path to libreoffice building quickly enough
that it's not going to reduce the overall dpb build time (the problem
DPB_PROPERTIES=parallel intends to solve is waiting for libreoffice to finish
when everything else is done. Moving to gmake may actually increase
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 06:21:43PM -0600, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
I thought you guys were talking about building cmake proper in parallel.
We did. cmake proper first builds a minimal bootstrap cmake, then
rebuilds itself with it, so getting cmake proper to build in parallel
*is* the same
No, our make is not ignoring -j, and it's passed to submakes. Using standard
posix mechanisms. That is, it's passed through the environment, using
MAKEFLAGS.
There are two ways to defeat that mechanism: either by explicitly wiping
out the environment, or by passing another -j somewhere.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com wrote:
No, our make is not ignoring -j, and it's passed to submakes. Using standard
posix mechanisms. That is, it's passed through the environment, using
MAKEFLAGS.
There are two ways to defeat that mechanism: either by
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Marc Espie wrote:
Very bad subject line, I almost did not read the thread, because
I thought you guys were talking about building cmake proper in parallel.
Anyways, there are TWO distinct points:
- problems with make -j.
- cmake not writing correct makefiles for
Marc Espie:
I thought you guys were talking about building cmake proper in parallel.
We did. cmake proper first builds a minimal bootstrap cmake, then
rebuilds itself with it, so getting cmake proper to build in parallel
*is* the same problem as getting any other cmake-using port to build
in
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 04:52:17PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Marc Espie:
I thought you guys were talking about building cmake proper in parallel.
We did. cmake proper first builds a minimal bootstrap cmake, then
rebuilds itself with it, so getting cmake proper to build in
Hey, dude-
On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:30, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
Anyways, there are TWO distinct points:
- problems with make -j.
- cmake not writing correct makefiles for parallel building without gmake.
The second one is the problem here. CMake doesn't do anything special for
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Kent R. Spillner kspill...@acm.org wrote:
Hey, dude-
On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:30, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
Anyways, there are TWO distinct points:
- problems with make -j.
- cmake not writing correct makefiles for parallel building without gmake.
I thought you guys were talking about building cmake proper in parallel.
We did. cmake proper first builds a minimal bootstrap cmake, then
rebuilds itself with it, so getting cmake proper to build in parallel
*is* the same problem as getting any other cmake-using port to build
in parallel.
13.12.2012 4:22 пользователь Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com написал:
I thought you guys were talking about building cmake proper in
parallel.
We did. cmake proper first builds a minimal bootstrap cmake, then
rebuilds itself with it, so getting cmake proper to build in parallel
*is*
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Vadim Zhukov persg...@gmail.com wrote:
13.12.2012 4:22 пользователь Amit Kulkarni amitk...@gmail.com написал:
I thought you guys were talking about building cmake proper in
parallel.
We did. cmake proper first builds a minimal bootstrap cmake, then
12 matches
Mail list logo